Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora
Theologos T Ioannidis1, Constantinos D Apostolou, Dimitrios S Korres
1University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, KAT Hospital, 2 Nikis Street, Kifissia, Athens, Greece.
Introduction:
We used an experimental hip model to assess the mechanical stability of a hip prosthesis, and compared the femoral medullary canal preparation techniques of reaming and broaching.
Methods:
15 pairs of cadaveric femora had a simulated replacement, the right femur with a reaming technique and the left with a broaching technique. Both femurs were radiographed to assess component positioning and cement mantle. The femurs were osteotomized 30 days after the procedure. The shear strength of the interface was studied at 4 different levels along an aluminum rod during push-out tests.
Results:
The overall mean value of the interface failure load was 15% lower with the reaming technique (6.5 kN for the reaming technique versus 7.7 kN for the broaching technique; p = 0.02).
Interpretation:
Broaching was superior to reaming for the preparation of the femoral canal, and should be used in order to increase primary stability. Further in vivo studies are required to account for factors such as intramedullary pressure, bleeding and surgical variations, which could not be accounted for in our study.
