Poor predictive value of broad-range PCR for the detection of arthroplasty infection in 92 cases

Konstantinos Panousis1, Peter Grigoris, Ian Butcher

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. panousis@hotmail.com

Acta Orthopaedica
|September 15, 2005
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) shows high sensitivity but low specificity for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections. This molecular test is not recommended for routine use due to frequent false positives in revision arthroplasty.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Molecular Diagnostics

Background:

  • Diagnosing prosthetic joint infections is difficult, lacking a definitive test.
  • Molecular methods offer potential for detecting infection in culture-negative cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting infection in failed joint replacements.
  • Assessing PCR's diagnostic accuracy in revision total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study of 91 patients undergoing revision arthroplasty.
  • Intraoperative synovial fluid analyzed using broad-range PCR for bacterial DNA.
  • Clinical diagnosis based on multiple criteria including cultures and histology.

Main Results:

  • 13% of joints were infected (12/92).
  • PCR detected bacterial DNA in 32 cases, yielding a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 74%.
  • The negative predictive value was high (98%), but the positive predictive value was low (34%).

Conclusions:

  • PCR is not recommended for routine diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections.
  • High false positive rates may stem from contamination, low-virulence bacteria, or host immune responses.

Related Concept Videos