Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Moral dilemmas and moral rules.

Shaun Nichols1, Ron Mallon

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. snichols@philosophy.utah.edu

Cognition
|September 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same author

How children map causal verbs to different causes across development.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Towards an AI biomedical scientist: Accelerating discoveries in neurodegenerative disease.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2025
Same author

Working across religions, cultures, settings, and development: Protocol for wave 2 data collection with children and parents by the developing belief network.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Norms emerge through iterated learning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Logical Concepts of (Im)possibility Guide Young Children's Decision-Making.

Developmental science·2025

People’s moral judgments reveal an asymmetry, distinguishing between diverting a threat and direct harm. This research highlights the crucial role of moral rules, beyond emotions, in navigating complex ethical dilemmas.

Area of Science:

  • Moral Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Ethics

Background:

  • Lay intuitions about moral dilemmas exhibit a significant asymmetry.
  • Commonly cited explanations focus on emotional responses, potentially overlooking other cognitive factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of moral rules in explaining the asymmetry in moral judgments.
  • To examine whether emotional force is the sole driver of this observed asymmetry.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to test participants' moral judgments.
  • Experiments manipulated the emotional salience of moral dilemmas.
  • Differentiated between rule violation and overall wrongness judgments.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • An asymmetry in moral judgments persisted even when emotional force was minimized.
  • Participants distinguished between actions that violate moral rules and those deemed wrong overall.
  • Rule representations, emotional responses, and cost-benefit analyses contribute to moral judgments.

Conclusions:

  • Moral judgments in dilemmas are not solely driven by emotions.
  • Moral rules play a significant and independent role in ethical reasoning.
  • A complex interplay of cognitive processes underlies judgments of moral wrongness.