Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simplified and quantitative saliva buffer capacity test using a hand-held pH meter.

Yuichi Kitasako1, Michiyo Moritsuka, Richard M Foxton

  • 1Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 5-45 Yushima 1-chome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan. kitasako.ope@tmd.ac.jp

American Journal of Dentistry
|September 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

UV-Mediated Photofunctionalization of Indirect Restorative Materials Enhances Bonding to a Resin-Based Luting Agent.

BioMed research international·2021
Same author

Effect of fluoride-releasing 4-META/MMA-TBB resin on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets: An in vitro µCT analysis.

Dental materials journal·2021
Same author

Evaluation of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Light and Heat Polymerized UDMA for DLP 3D Printer.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Effects of Different Tooth Conditioners on the Bonding of Universal Self-etching Adhesive to Enamel.

The journal of adhesive dentistry·2021
Same author

Effect of photo-thermal acceleration on in-office bleaching.

Odontology·2021
Same author

Effect of a temporary sealing material on the bond strength of CAD/CAM inlay restorations with resin-coating technique.

Dental materials journal·2021

This study compared saliva buffer capacity in caries-risk patients using a hand-held pH meter and a buffer strip. Both methods showed significant correlation, though the buffer strip yielded inconclusive results in some cases.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Dental Research
  • Clinical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Saliva plays a crucial role in maintaining oral pH balance.
  • Accurate assessment of saliva buffer capacity is vital for identifying individuals at risk of dental caries.
  • Existing diagnostic tools for saliva buffer capacity vary in accuracy and ease of use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the efficacy of a hand-held pH meter (B-212) and a commercial buffer strip (CRT) for measuring saliva buffer capacity.
  • To assess the correlation between these two methods in patients identified as being at risk of developing caries.
  • To determine the reliability of each method in categorizing saliva buffer capacity (high, medium, low).

Main Methods:

  • Stimulated saliva was collected from 109 patients at risk of caries.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Saliva buffer capacity was measured using a hand-held pH meter (B-212) with titration of hydrochloric acid (HCl).
  • A commercial buffer strip (CRT) was also used for evaluation, and results were statistically analyzed using Bartlett's test.
  • Main Results:

    • Both the B-212 pH meter and CRT categorized saliva buffer capacity into high, medium, and low ranks.
    • The B-212 pH meter results showed 50% high, 17% medium, and 33% low buffer capacity.
    • The CRT showed 56% high, 17% medium, and 27% low buffer capacity, with 23 inconclusive results.
    • A significant correlation (P < 0.001) was found between the ranking results of both methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The hand-held pH meter (B-212) and the commercial buffer strip (CRT) demonstrate a significant correlation in assessing saliva buffer capacity.
    • The B-212 pH meter provides a more consistent measurement, whereas the CRT may yield inconclusive results.
    • Both methods can be utilized to rank saliva buffer capacity in patients at risk of caries, aiding in risk assessment and management.