Behavioral differences among fourteen inbred mouse strains commonly used as disease models

Gerald W M Bothe1, Valerie J Bolivar, Michelle J Vedder

  • 1Taconic Farms, Germantown, New York 12526, USA.

Comparative Medicine
|September 15, 2005
PubMed

Insights

Choosing the right mouse strain is crucial for research. This study compared 14 mouse strains and one hybrid in behavioral tests, revealing significant differences in motor learning, activity, and fear conditioning relevant for transgenic and drug studies.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Genetics
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Mouse models are essential for preclinical research.
  • Strain selection impacts experimental outcomes.
  • Transgenic and knockout mouse production relies on specific inbred strains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the behavior of 14 inbred mouse strains and one F1 hybrid.
  • To assess performance in motor learning, open-field activity, and fear conditioning.
  • To guide the selection of appropriate mouse strains for research.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 14 inbred mouse strains and one F1 hybrid.
  • Conducted rotorod, open-field activity-habituation, and contextual/cued fear conditioning tests.
  • Analyzed parameters including latency to fall, total distance, center distance, velocity, and vertical activity.

Main Results:

  • SJL/JCrNTac mice showed shortest rotorod latencies; DBA/2NTac mice exhibited impaired motor learning.
  • NOD/MrkTac mice were most active in the open field, while 129T2/EvEmsJ and A/JCrTac were least active.
  • FVB/NTac mice showed reduced fear conditioning responses; C57BL/6J females had higher open-field activity than C57BL/6NTac.

Conclusions:

  • Significant behavioral variations exist among commonly used mouse strains.
  • Strain background critically influences results in behavioral assays.
  • Informed strain selection is vital for reproducible transgenic, gene targeting, and drug research.