Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Plant self-incompatibility systems: a molecular evolutionary perspective.

Deborah Charlesworth1, Xavier Vekemans, Vincent Castric

  • 1Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratory, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK. deborah.charlesworth@ed.ac.uk

The New Phytologist
|September 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Self-incompatibility systems in flowering plants prevent self-fertilization. Recent findings reveal distinct recognition mechanisms and gene interactions, offering insights into plant reproductive evolution.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Asymmetrical diversification of the receptor-ligand interaction controlling self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis.

eLife·2026
Same author

Autopolyploidy exacerbates dominance masking under negative frequency-dependent selection: evidence from sporophytic self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis arenosa and Arabidopsis lyrata.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Autopolyploid establishment under gametophytic self-incompatibility: the impact of self-fertilization and pollen limitation.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same author

A Recipe for a Good π. How to Properly Estimate Population Genetics Summary Statistics and Why we Should Systematically Report Them.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Why recombination hotspots?

PLoS genetics·2026
Same author

Dominance modifiers at the Arabidopsis self-incompatibility locus retain proto-miRNA features and act through non-canonical pathways.

PLoS genetics·2026

Area of Science:

  • Plant reproductive biology
  • Molecular evolution
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Self-incompatibility (SI) systems prevent self-fertilization in angiosperms, evolving independently multiple times.
  • Three primary SI model systems (Solanaceae, Rosaceae, Anthirrhinum; poppy; Brassicaceae) are molecularly characterized.
  • Two SI systems now have identified genes for both pollen-pistil recognition components, confirming a lock-and-key mechanism.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent findings in three well-studied SI systems.
  • To analyze implications for understanding SI gene polymorphism and coevolution.
  • To explore SI within the context of tightly linked genomic regions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent molecular and genetic findings in SI research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of identified SI genes and recognition mechanisms.
  • In-depth analysis of SI gene polymorphism and coevolutionary dynamics.

    • Main Results:

    • Genes for both pollen-pistil recognition components are identified in two SI systems.
    • These components are distinct, functioning as a lock-and-key mechanism.
    • Recent findings provide a framework for understanding SI gene evolution.

    Conclusions:

    • The lock-and-key model is supported by identified SI genes.
    • Understanding SI gene polymorphism and coevolution is advanced by these findings.
    • The tightly linked genomic region of SI genes is crucial for their evolution.