Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Revisiting "scale-free" networks.

Evelyn Fox Keller1

  • 1Program in Science, Technology and Society, MIT, 77 Mass Ave, E51-185, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. efkeller@mit.edu

Bioessays : News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology
|September 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Science and gender, feminism and history of science: interview with Evelyn Fox Keller].

Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos·2022
Same author

Climate science, truth, and democracy.

Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences·2017
Same author

Active matter, then and now.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2016
Same author

Doing justice to allosteric regulation.

Comptes rendus biologies·2015
Same author

From gene action to reactive genomes.

The Journal of physiology·2014
Same author

Towards a science of informed matter.

Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences·2011

Power-law distributions in complex networks are not special and do not indicate a universal architecture. These patterns are easily generated by various mechanisms, with network structure determined by specific system constraints.

Area of Science:

  • Network Science
  • Complex Systems Analysis
  • Statistical Physics

Background:

  • Complex networks often exhibit power-law distributions in their connectivity.
  • These findings were initially surprising to researchers accustomed to random network models.
  • Power-law distributions have been observed in diverse systems, including biological and social networks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the significance of power-law distributions in complex networks.
  • To challenge the notion of a universal architecture inferred from these distributions.
  • To investigate the generative mechanisms and specificity of network architectures.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of network connectivity patterns.
  • Examination of generative models for complex networks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative study of different network types (biological, social, random).

    • Main Results:

    • Power-law distributions are not inherently special or rare.
    • Multiple mechanisms can easily generate power-law distributions.
    • Network architecture is specific to system constraints, not universal.

    Conclusions:

    • The prevalence of power-law distributions does not imply a universal network architecture.
    • The ease of generating these distributions suggests they are emergent properties.
    • Understanding specific system constraints is key to comprehending network structures.