Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone.

André Büchter1, Johannes Kleinheinz, Hans Peter Wiesmann

  • 1Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. Buchtea@uni-muenster.de

Clinical Oral Implants Research
|September 17, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Periodontal Status and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Reticular and Nonreticular Oral Lichen Planus: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Clinical and experimental dental research·2026
Same author

Probing transcription factor subsets in gene regulatory networks.

Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB·2026
Same author

Nutritional conditions in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients -prospective longitudinal observational study.

Head & face medicine·2026
Same author

Does expander design influence the risk of asymmetric palatal expansion? A retrospective cohort study.

Head & face medicine·2025
Same author

Dietary supplementation with L-carnitine elevates intracellular carnitine levels and affects gene expression of SLC25A20 and COX4I1, as well as non-mitochondrial respiration of bovine blood cells during systemic immune challenge.

Frontiers in immunology·2025
Same author

Changes in patient-reported chief complaints with orthognathic surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Progress in orthodontics·2025

Conventional implant insertion techniques promote superior bone-to-implant contact compared to the osteotome method. This difference in osseointegration is evident by 28 days, indicating enhanced early-stage interface formation with conventional preparation.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology
  • Orthopedic Research

Background:

  • Osseointegration is crucial for dental implant success.
  • The osteotome technique offers potential advantages in bone preservation.
  • Understanding interface reactions is key to optimizing implant stability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the bone-to-implant interface reaction between the osteotome technique and conventional drilling for cylinder implants.
  • To evaluate the influence of insertion method on early osseointegration in an animal model.

Main Methods:

  • 64 cylinder implants were placed in Göttinger minipig tibias.
  • Implant sites were prepared using conventional drills (control) or the osteotome technique (experimental).
  • Bone tissue responses were analyzed via histomorphometry, fluorescence microscopy, and SEM at 7 and 28 days.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Initial bone-to-implant contact (7 days) showed no significant difference between groups.
  • After 28 days, conventional preparation resulted in a statistically significant higher bone-to-implant contact ratio (63.47%) compared to the osteotome technique (44.81%).
  • Both methods showed new bone formation, but conventional sites exhibited enhanced direct bone-implant contact without fibrous tissue encapsulation.

Conclusions:

  • Conventional implant site preparation leads to improved early-stage interface formation.
  • Enhanced osseointegration with conventional techniques may contribute to better long-term implant stability.