Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cluster randomized controlled trials.

Suezann Puffer1, David J Torgerson, Judith Watson

  • 1York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|September 17, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Reducing the impact of diabetic foot ulcers (REDUCE): study protocol for an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Methodological changes made to NIHR-funded randomised controlled trials: review of 100 trials.

Trials·2026
Same author

Correction: Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same author

Challenges and solutions to the implementation of studies within a trial: The experiences of the PROMETHEUS programme.

Research methods in medicine & health sciences·2026
Same author

Correction: A meta-analysis of previous falls and subsequent fracture risk in cohort studies.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
See all related articles

Cluster randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for interventions but prone to bias. This study identifies potential biases in cluster RCTs and offers strategies to mitigate them for more reliable health and educational research.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Cluster randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly utilized for interventions involving groups.
  • They are particularly valuable for health promotion and educational research where individual randomization is impractical.
  • However, cluster RCTs present unique design and execution challenges compared to individually randomized trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss potential sources of bias in cluster randomized trials.
  • To provide recommendations for avoiding bias in the design and execution of cluster RCTs.

Main Methods:

  • Review of design features and potential threats to validity in cluster RCTs.
  • Discussion of common issues leading to bias in group-randomized studies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Cluster RCTs are susceptible to various threats that can introduce bias.
  • Specific design elements can increase vulnerability to bias.
  • Identifying these vulnerabilities is crucial for study integrity.

Conclusions:

  • Careful consideration of design and execution is necessary to minimize bias in cluster RCTs.
  • Proactive strategies are needed to ensure the validity of findings from cluster-randomized research.
  • Addressing potential biases enhances the reliability of evidence from group-based interventions.