Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Large-scale neural network for sentence processing.

Ayanna Cooke1, Murray Grossman, Christian DeVita

  • 1Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Brain and Language
|September 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ComBat-Predict Enhances Generalizability of Neuroimaging Models to New Sites.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

Medial temporal lobe Tau-Neurodegeneration mismatch from structural imaging and plasma biomarkers.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Enhancement of in vivo 7T magnetic resonance neuroimaging via flexible metasurfaces.

Npj imaging·2026
Same author

Transformer Enabled Half Z‑spectrum Sampling B<sub>0</sub> Inhomogeneity Correction for GluCEST and NOE MRI.

Chemical & biomedical imaging·2026
Same author

Portal Vein Diameter on Routine Clinical CT: Establishing Normals and Disease Associations.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Hepatic and abdominal adiposity in type 2 diabetes as assessed with machine learning on computed tomography scans.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals that sentence comprehension involves a core brain network for grammar, with additional areas recruited based on working memory demands. These findings illuminate the neural basis of syntactic processing and memory.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Sentence comprehension relies on grammatical processing and executive functions like working memory.
  • The neural underpinnings of how working memory influences grammatical processing remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural network supporting grammatical processing during sentence comprehension.
  • To determine if working memory demands modulate the activation of specific brain regions during syntactic processing.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to measure brain activity.
  • Participants performed coherence judgments on sentences with varying syntactic features.
  • Cortical activation patterns were compared across different grammatical conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The ventral left inferior frontal cortex showed activation across all grammatical judgments.
  • The dorsal left inferior frontal cortex was increasingly recruited for grammatical features with higher working memory loads.
  • The left posterolateral temporal cortex and anterior cingulate were also implicated in specific grammatical judgments.

Conclusions:

  • A large-scale neural network supports sentence processing, comprising core regions for grammatical feature detection and repair.
  • Additional brain regions are recruited based on the working memory demands associated with specific grammatical features.
  • This network model provides insights into the interplay between grammar and working memory in sentence comprehension.