Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation of genetic maps.

Thomas L York1, Richard T Durrett, Steven Tanksley

  • 1Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

Genetical Research
|September 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Centromeric satellite expansion drives genome evolution in the snowy owl.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

Genome Scanning Reveals the Genetic Basis of a Color Pattern Morphotype in an Island Population of the European Adder (Vipera berus).

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

The genomic basis of adaptive leaf variation in the Galápagos giant daisies.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

WASTER: Practical de novo Phylogenomics from Low-coverage Short Reads.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Diffeomorphic Independent Contrasts for Ancestral Reconstruction of Shapes.

Systematic biology·2026
Same author

Erratum to: Accuracy of thick and thin intraocular lens power formulas using paraxial vergence calculation.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Proper experimental design and sound statistical inference win every time: a commentary on 'Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data' by M. Kathleen Kerr and Gary A. Churchill.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Wild populations are smaller than we think: a commentary on 'Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review' by Richard Frankham.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Identity and coalescence in structured populations: a commentary on 'Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times' by Montgomery Slatkin.

Genetical research·2008
See all related articles

Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based Bayesian methods improve genetic map estimation, especially with genotyping errors. This enhanced Bayesian approach is suitable for large datasets, offering accurate genetic distance estimates.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Bayesian methods and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) are increasingly used for genetic map estimation.
  • Existing MCMC Bayesian methods accurately handle missing data and genotyping errors.
  • Previous methods were limited in applicability to large datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend MCMC Bayesian methods for genetic map estimation to large datasets.
  • To evaluate the statistical properties of the enhanced Bayesian method through simulations.
  • To compare the performance of the MCMC Bayesian method against the Mapmaker likelihood method.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an extension of MCMC Bayesian methods for large-scale genetic map estimation.
  • Conducted extensive simulations to assess statistical properties.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared the Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimator with posterior expectation estimators.
  • Benchmarked against the Mapmaker software's likelihood method.

    • Main Results:

    • The Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimator demonstrated superior performance compared to posterior expectation estimators.
    • MCMC Bayesian and Mapmaker methods showed similar performance without genotyping errors.
    • The MCMC Bayesian method exhibited a significant advantage in the presence of genotyping errors.
    • No similar advantage was observed for handling missing data.
    • Re-analysis of eggplant data yielded smaller genetic distance estimates using the MCMC Bayesian method.

    Conclusions:

    • The enhanced MCMC Bayesian method is effective for genetic map estimation in large datasets.
    • This Bayesian approach offers robustness against genotyping errors.
    • The MAP estimator is recommended for genetic distance estimation in this context.