Related Experiment Videos
Use of anatomical dolls by Boston-area professionals
K A Kendall-Tackett1, M W Watson
1Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254.
Child Abuse & Neglect
|January 1, 1992
Summary
Professionals using anatomical dolls for child sexual abuse interviews are better trained and more experienced than previously reported. Most follow protocols and avoid leading questioning techniques with the dolls.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Forensic Interviewing
- Child Abuse Research
Background:
- Anatomical dolls are controversial tools in child sexual abuse evaluations.
- Previous research suggested inconsistent and potentially leading use of these dolls.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the actual usage patterns of anatomical dolls by professionals evaluating child sexual abuse victims.
- To assess the training, experience, and adherence to protocols among these professionals.
Main Methods:
- Survey of a representative sample of professionals who use anatomical dolls.
- Data collection on training, experience, and specific interviewing behaviors.
Main Results:
- 96.6% of professionals reported training in anatomical doll use.
- 77.8% followed a standard interviewing protocol.
- 97.3% had at least one year of experience.
- Most professionals avoided presenting unclothed dolls or undressing them for the child.
Conclusions:
- Professionals using anatomical dolls in this sample are more experienced and better trained than previously assumed.
- Findings challenge prior reports of leading behaviors and suggest more standardized practices.