Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should we design our descendants?

Audrey R Chapman

    Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
    |September 24, 2005
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Addressing Environmental Injustices Requires a Public Health Ethics and/or Human Rights Perspective.

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024
    Same author

    Promoting children's rights to health and well-being in the United States.

    Lancet regional health. Americas·2023
    Same author

    Do Pluripotent Stem Cells Offer a New Path to Reproduction?

    American journal of law & medicine·2023
    Same author

    Impact of Human Rights Council Reports on Mental Health.

    Health and human rights·2022
    Same author

    Climate Justice, Humans Rights, and the Case for Reparations.

    Health and human rights·2021
    Same author

    Undoing Funding Injustices for Bioethics Research on Racial Justice.

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2021
    Same journal

    Playing God? Moral agency in an emerging world.

    Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics·2005
    Same journal

    After the slippery slope: Dutch experiences on regulating active euthanasia.

    Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics·2005
    Same journal

    Bioethics and the marginalization of mental illness.

    Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics·2005
    Same journal

    Practicing patients, compassion, and hope at the end of life: mining the passion of Jesus in Luke for a Christian model of dying well.

    Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics·2005
    Same journal

    Ethical issues and approaches in stem cell research: from international insights to a proposal.

    Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics·2005
    Same journal

    Cultural bias and liberal neutrality: reconsidering the relationship between religion and liberalism through the lens of the physician-assisted suicide debate.

    Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics·2005
    See all related articles

    Genetic modification technologies offer disease treatment but raise ethical concerns. This paper argues against their development due to justice impacts, advocating for public discussion and regulation of inheritable genetic alterations.

    Area of Science:

    • Genetics
    • Bioethics
    • Sociology

    Background:

    • Advances in genetic research and reproductive technologies enable potential inheritable human genetic modification.
    • The prospect of modifying genes for disease treatment or enhancement raises significant ethical questions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the ethical and justice implications of inheritable human genetic modification.
    • To evaluate the potential societal consequences of using genetic technologies for enhancement purposes.

    Main Methods:

    • Ethical analysis of genetic modification technologies.
    • Exploration of justice-related impacts on future generations.
    • Review of current regulatory frameworks and public discourse.

    Main Results:

    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Developing inheritable genetic modification technologies poses significant justice challenges that are difficult to mitigate.
    • The potential for unintended consequences and exacerbation of social inequalities is high.

    Conclusions:

    • Strong arguments exist against the development of inheritable genetic modification technologies due to unavoidable justice impacts.
    • Public education, broad societal discussion (including religious communities), and enhanced regulation are crucial for guiding future genetic research and applications.