Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolution of methodological standards in surgical trials.

Carleen Ellis1, Jane L Hall, Alizan Khalil

  • 1Department of Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

ANZ Journal of Surgery
|September 24, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Methodological standards in surgical trials show progressive improvement, yet key areas like intervention concealment and outcome reporting require careful attention. Results of these trials should be interpreted cautiously.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient Blood Management Program Implementation and Assessment Tool: Measuring Compliance With Guidelines and World Health Organization 2021 Policy Brief.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2025
Same author

Acral Nodular Melanoma at a Site of Trauma.

Kansas journal of medicine·2023
Same author

Decreasing tobacco use promotes ulcer healing in a patient with Buerger's disease.

Clinical case reports·2023
Same author

Syphilis presenting as exfoliative erythroderma.

International journal of dermatology·2022
Same author

Dystrophic calcinosis cutis: treatment with intravenous sodium thiosulfate.

Cutis·2020
Same author

Acute Cutaneous Necrosis: A Guide to Early Diagnosis and Treatment.

Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery·2017

Area of Science:

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Trials
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement provides guidelines for clinical trial reporting.
  • Assessing adherence to CONSORT standards is crucial for evaluating trial quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze trends in the methodological quality of surgical trials over time.
  • To identify specific areas of improvement and persistent challenges in surgical trial reporting.

Main Methods:

  • A review of 490 surgical trials published between 1969 and 2003 in the ANZ Journal of Surgery and the British Journal of Surgery.
  • Evaluation of compliance with 12 key CONSORT Statement criteria.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • An irregular but progressive improvement in overall methodological standards was observed.
  • Significant improvements were noted in sample size estimation, randomization, intervention concealment, baseline comparisons, and outcome reporting.
  • Compliance remained below 50% for intervention concealment, assessment blinding, and outcome reporting methods in the last decade.

    • Conclusions:

    • While surgical trial methodology has improved, certain critical aspects still need enhancement.
    • Findings underscore the need for careful interpretation of surgical trial results due to remaining methodological limitations.