Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy.

Kimberly J O'Malley1, Karon F Cook, Matt D Price

  • 1Pearson Educational Mearsurement, Austin, TX 78758, USA.

Health Services Research
|September 24, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Defining chronic pain impact levels: a patient-clinician approach using PROMIS® pain interference scores.

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2025
Same author

People with multiple sclerosis help design a tool to measure physical functioning and how it affects their daily lives: a plain language summary.

Neurodegenerative disease management·2024
Same author

Measuring fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis - which questionnaire should be used? A Plain Language Summary of Publication.

Neurodegenerative disease management·2024
Same author

Empowered Relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, and health education for people with chronic pain: a comparison of outcomes at 6-month Follow-up for a randomized controlled trial.

Pain reports·2024
Same author

Establishing the interpretability and utility of the 4-item BriefPCS.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Lower Quadrant Edema Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Is Reliable, Valid, and Efficient for Patients With Lymphatic and Venous Disorders.

Physical therapy·2023
Same journal

Engaging Families in Pediatric Care Management: A Qualitative Study From the North Carolina Integrated Care for Kids Model.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Hospital-Physician Vertical Integration on Utilization-Driven Changes in Healthcare Spending for an All-Payer Population With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Sepsis Coding and Payment to U.S. Hospitals.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Stagnation in Achieving Recommended Methadone Doses in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Promoting Transplant Access Through Dialysis Facility Performance Metrics: A Double-Edged Sword.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Understanding Medicaid Estate Recovery: The Experience of North Carolina and Policy Implications for Future Reforms.

Health services research·2026
See all related articles

Errors in International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding stem from patient information quality, clinician factors, and coder practices. Understanding these sources improves the accuracy and appropriate use of ICD codes in healthcare.

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Medical Coding
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are crucial for statistical analysis, research, policy, and finance.
  • The application of ICD codes has expanded beyond traditional morbidity and mortality classification.
  • Accurate ICD coding is essential for reliable healthcare data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze potential error sources within the inpatient International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding process.
  • To provide a systematic framework for evaluating ICD code accuracy.
  • To enhance the understanding of limitations in ICD code application.

Main Methods:

  • Summarized the inpatient ICD diagnostic coding process from admission to code assignment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined error potentials at each stage of the coding workflow.
  • Reviewed methods for assessing the accuracy of assigned codes.

    • Main Results:

    • Key errors originate from the quality/quantity of admission data, patient-provider communication, and clinician expertise.
    • Variations in electronic/written records, coder training, and quality control impact accuracy.
    • Unintentional and intentional coder errors, including misspecification, unbundling, and upcoding, were identified.

    Conclusions:

    • Awareness of the coding process and potential error points enables users to better assess ICD code applicability.
    • Understanding limitations allows for more appropriate utilization of ICD codes in various healthcare contexts.
    • Systematic evaluation of code accuracy is vital for reliable data interpretation.