Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Lineage Tracing and Clonal Analysis in Developing Cerebral Cortex Using Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers (MADM)
Published on: May 8, 2020
Aristotle and headless clones
1Department of Philosophy, Biola University, 13800 Biola Ave., La Mirada, CA 90639, USA. timothy.mosteller@biola.edu
Abstract:
Cloned organisms can be genetically altered so that they do not exhibit higher brain functioning. This form of therapeutic cloning allows for genetically identical organs and tissues to be harvested from the clone for the use of the organism that is cloned. "Spare parts" cloning promises many opportunities for future medical advances. What is the ontological and ethical status of spare parts, headless clones? This paper attempts to answer this question from the perspective of Aristotle's view of the soul. Aristotle's metaphysics as applied to his view of biological essences generates an ethic that can contribute to moral reasoning regarding the use of headless spare parts clones. The task of this paper is to show the implications that Aristotle's view of the soul, if it is true, would have on the ethics of headless, spare parts cloning.
Insights
Therapeutic cloning can create genetically identical organs for transplant. This paper explores the ethical status of headless clones using Aristotle's philosophy.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Philosophy of Science
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- Therapeutic cloning offers genetically identical organs for transplantation.
- Genetically altered clones may lack higher brain function.
- The ethical status of 'spare parts' clones requires examination.
Discussion:
- This paper applies Aristotle's metaphysics and view of the soul to the ethical debate surrounding headless clones.
- Aristotle's concept of biological essences informs a potential ethical framework.
- The paper investigates the moral implications of using clones solely for organ harvesting.
Key Insights:
- Aristotle's philosophy provides a framework for evaluating the moral status of headless clones.
- The concept of the soul, as defined by Aristotle, is central to this ethical analysis.
- Ethical considerations arise from the potential for genetically identical organ harvesting.
Outlook:
- Further philosophical and ethical inquiry into cloning technologies is warranted.
- Aristotle's ethical framework may offer novel perspectives on bioethical dilemmas.
- Understanding the ontological status of clones is crucial for future medical applications.
Related Concept Videos
Reproductive Cloning
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
In SCNT, an egg cell is taken from an animal and its nucleus is removed, creating an enucleated egg. Then a somatic cell—any cell that is not a sex...
Reproductive Cloning
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
In SCNT, an egg cell is taken from an animal and its nucleus is removed, creating an enucleated egg. Then a somatic cell—any cell that is not a sex...
Reason and Intuition
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Cloning of Dolly the Sheep
Personal Identity

