Related Experiment Videos
With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: mood and the false memory effect
Justin Storbeck1, Gerald L Clore
1University of Virginia, USA. storbeck@virginia.edu
Psychological Science
|September 27, 2005
Summary
Positive moods enhance false memory creation, while negative moods reduce it. Moods affect memory encoding, not retrieval, influencing how easily false memories are formed.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Affective Science
Background:
- The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is a well-established method for inducing false memories in laboratory settings.
- The affect-as-information hypothesis suggests that mood states can influence cognitive processing, potentially impacting memory formation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of experimentally induced positive and negative moods on the DRM false memory effect.
- To determine whether mood effects on false memories occur during memory encoding or retrieval.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted using the DRM paradigm.
- Participants were induced into positive, negative, or neutral mood states.
- Experiment 2 included inclusion instructions to differentiate encoding from retrieval effects.
Main Results:
- Individuals in negative moods exhibited significantly fewer false memories compared to those in positive or neutral moods.
- Moods were found to influence the accessibility of critical lures during the encoding phase.
- Evidence suggests mood does not significantly alter monitoring processes during retrieval.
Conclusions:
- Induced mood states, particularly negative ones, can significantly reduce the likelihood of forming false memories.
- The findings support the affect-as-information hypothesis by demonstrating that mood impacts encoding processes, specifically lure accessibility.
- Moods influence memory formation by altering cognitive processing strategies during encoding, rather than by affecting retrieval monitoring.