Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

A Methodological Approach to Non-invasive Assessments of Vascular Function and Morphology
Published on: February 7, 2015
Measures of total stress-induced blood pressure responses are associated with vascular damage
Pietro Nazzaro1, Teresa Seccia, Vito Vulpis
1Department of Clinical Methodology and Medico-Surgical Technology, Section of Internal Medicine and Hypertension, University of Bari, Policlinico Consorziale, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. nazzaro@htn.uniba.it
Insights
Total blood pressure stress response, measured as area-under-the-curve (AUC), is strongly linked to hypertension and vascular damage. This comprehensive measure, including baseline and recovery, is more effective than other reactivity assessments for understanding cardiovascular health.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Hypertension Research
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Cardiovascular reactivity assessment for hypertension and vascular damage remains debated.
- Existing methods for measuring cardiovascular response lack consensus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between hypertension, vascular damage, and various cardiovascular response measures.
- To determine the most effective method for assessing cardiovascular reactivity in relation to hypertension.
Main Methods:
- Studied 40 normal-high blood pressure individuals and 80 untreated hypertensive patients.
- Utilized postischemic forearm vascular resistance (mFVR) to categorize hypertensive subjects based on vascular damage.
- Assessed reactivity using Stroop and cold pressor tests, measuring blood pressure, heart rate, and vascular resistance, with reactivity quantified via area-under-the-curve (AUC).
Main Results:
- Area-under-the-curve (AUC) for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mFVR increased progressively across study groups.
- AUC of SBP, DBP, forearm blood flow, and resistance showed the highest correlation with vascular damage.
- Multiple regression analysis identified AUC of SBP and forearm blood flow as significant predictors of vascular damage.
Conclusions:
- Total blood pressure stress response, quantified as AUC across baseline and recovery phases, demonstrates a significant association with hypertension and vascular damage.
- This comprehensive AUC measure is superior to other reactivity assessments in predicting hypertension and vascular damage.
Background:
The role of cardiovascular reactivity to study hypertension, and the assessment methods, are still controversial. We aimed to verify the association of hypertension and vascular damage with several measures of cardiovascular response.
Methods:
We studied 40 patients with normal-high (132 +/- 1/87 +/- 1 mm Hg) blood pressure (Group 1) and 80 untreated hypertensive subjects. Postischemic forearm vascular resistance (mFVR) served to differentiate hypertensive subjects (142 +/- 2/92 +/- 1 mm Hg v 143 +/- 2/94 +/- 2 mm Hg, P = NS) with a lower (Group 2) and higher (Group 3) hemodynamic index of vascular damage (4.8 +/- .05 v 6.3 +/- .09, P < .001). Reactivity was induced by Stroop (5') and cold pressor (90") tests. We measured muscular contraction and skin conductance as indices of emotional arousal, blood pressure, heart rate, forearm blood flow, and vascular resistance. Reactivity measures included: a) change from baseline, b) residualized score, c) cumulative change from baseline and residualized score, and d) total reactivity as area-under-the-curve (AUC), including changes occurring during baseline and recovery phases.
Results:
The AUC of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mFVR progressively increased in the groups (P < .001). Corrections of anthropometric and metabolic confounders were introduced in the Pearson equation between mFVR and reactivity measures. The AUC of SBP, DBP, and forearm blood flow and resistance demonstrated the highest (P < .001) correlation. On multiple regression analysis, AUC of SBP (beta = 0.634) and forearm blood flow (beta = -0.337) were predictive (P < .001) of vascular damage.
Conclusions:
Total blood pressure stress response, as AUC, including baseline and recovery phases, was significantly better associated with hypertension and vascular damage than the other reactivity measures studied.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Vascular Resistance
The primary determinants of vascular resistance are vessel diameter, blood viscosity, and vessel length. Among these, vessel diameter plays the most significant role due to the fourth power relationship described by...
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
