Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Expressing treatment-associated changes.

S Chrubasik1, C Conradt, A Black

  • 1Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany. sigrun.chrubasik@klinikum.uni-freiburg.de

Zeitschrift Fur Rheumatologie
|September 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Position statement from the British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy on insertional oncogenesis in gene-engineered advanced cell therapy products for treatment of haematological disorders.

British journal of haematology·2025
Same author

Evaluation of the performance of a lateral flow device for quantitative detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG.

Clinical immunology communications·2023
Same author

Multiomics analysis of adaptation to repeated DNA damage in prostate cancer cells.

Epigenetics·2023
Same author

iBDecide: A web-based tool to promote engagement in shared decision-making among adolescents with ulcerative colitis.

Patient education and counseling·2021
Same author

Corrigendum to 'Measures of body fatness and height in early and mid-to-late adulthood and prostate cancer: risk and mortality in The Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer': [Annals of Oncology Volume 31, Issue 1, January 2020, Pages 103-114].

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2021
Same author

Measures of body fatness and height in early and mid-to-late adulthood and prostate cancer: risk and mortality in The Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2020
Same journal

[Prevention strategies in rheumatoid arthritis : From primary prevention to targeted drug interception].

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·2026
Same journal

Methodological concerns and data discrepancies in the indirect treatment comparison of belimumab and anifrolumab.

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the comparative efficacy of belimumab vs. anifrolumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: a response.

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·2026
Same journal

[Update: DMARDs for MGUS].

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·2026
Same journal

[A potpourri of diagnoses-Unusual manifestations of a chronic inflammatory bowel disease : Case report].

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·2026
Same journal

[Not measurable but immeasurably important : Fever-The leading symptom of ancient medical theory].

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·2026
See all related articles

Standardizing how treatment effects are reported in osteoarthritis research is crucial. Different methods for calculating effect size yield poor correlations and alter perceived treatment outcomes, necessitating clear guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Rheumatology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) seeks consensus on outcome measures for clinical studies.
  • Lack of standardized methods for expressing effect size in osteoarthritis research hinders comparability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate different methods of expressing effect size for changes in outcome measures.
  • To assess the impact of various expression methods on perceived treatment effect magnitudes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from a published study to calculate effect sizes using four distinct methods.
  • Methods included dividing change from baseline by individual baseline or by the standard deviation (SD) of baseline, using both mean and median values.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Correlations between the different effect size expression methods were poor.
  • The perceived relative magnitude of treatment effects varied significantly depending on the chosen expression method.

Conclusions:

  • Current methods for expressing effect size in osteoarthritis research are inconsistent.
  • OARSI and other consensus organizations should recommend a standardized method for effect size expression.
  • Authors must justify their chosen method or provide comprehensive data to ensure accurate interpretation of results.