Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Differential Effects of Lipid-lowering Drugs in Modulating Morphology of Cholesterol Particles
Published on: November 10, 2017
Rosuvastatin is cost-effective compared with atorvastatin in reaching cholesterol goals
Mark Hirsch1, John O'donnell, Anders Olsson
1AstraZeneca, Wilmslow, UK. Mark.Hirsch@astrazeneca.com
Insights
Rosuvastatin 10 mg is more cost-effective than atorvastatin 10 mg for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and achieving treatment goals. This statin therapy offers better efficacy and value for patients managing high cholesterol.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Clinical Lipidology
Background:
- Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a primary risk factor for coronary heart disease.
- Achieving LDL-C treatment goals is crucial for cardiovascular risk reduction.
- Newer statins like rosuvastatin offer potential for improved patient outcomes within budget constraints.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg.
- To evaluate the efficacy in lowering LDL-C and achieving guideline-defined goals after 12 weeks.
- To compare the cost per 1% LDL-C reduction and cost per patient achieving goal.
Main Methods:
- Pooled analysis of data from three randomized clinical trials.
- Efficacy assessed by percent LDL-C reduction and proportion of patients reaching target.
- Cost-effectiveness calculated based on drug acquisition costs only.
Main Results:
- Rosuvastatin 10 mg demonstrated a lower cost per 1% LDL-C reduction ($1.85 vs. $2.37).
- Significantly lower costs were observed for rosuvastatin 10 mg to achieve European LDL-C goals ($130.18 vs. $242.44).
- Costs to reach National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III goals were also lower with rosuvastatin ($115 vs. $163).
Conclusions:
- Rosuvastatin 10 mg is more efficacious and cost-effective than atorvastatin 10 mg for LDL-C reduction.
- Rosuvastatin facilitates achievement of LDL-C treatment targets more efficiently.
- This finding supports rosuvastatin as a preferred option for lipid management in clinical practice.
Background:
Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels reduces the risk of coronary heart disease. The introduction of a highly efficacious new statin, rosuvastatin, may enable more patients to be treated to LDL-C goal within a fixed budget.
Objectives:
To compare the cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg in lowering LDL-C and achieving guideline goals after 12 weeks of treatment. The LDL-C goals were those recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III and the Third Joint European Task Force.
Methods:
The analysis was performed on pooled data from three clinical trials. Efficacy was measured as the percent reduction in LDL-C and the proportion of patients who reached guideline LDL-C goals following the first 12 weeks of treatment, prior to dose titration. Costs comprised drug acquisition costs only. The cost-effectiveness measures were cost per 1% reduction in LDL-C and cost per patient treated to their LDL-C goal.
Results:
Treatment with rosuvastatin 10 mg costs 1.85 per 1% reduction in LDL-C, compared with 2.37 per 1% reduction with atorvastatin 10 mg. The average costs per patient treated to the European LDL-C goals were 130.18 for rosuvastatin 10 mg and 242.44 for atorvastatin 10 mg. Treating to NCEP ATP III goals costs 115 per patient treated with rosuvastatin 10 mg vs. 163 per patient treated with atorvastatin 10 mg.
Conclusions:
Rosuvastatin has the same acquisition costs as and is more efficacious than atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C and treating patients to target LDL-C levels.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Lipids: Dietary Sources and Requirements
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Bioequivalence: Overview