Endothelin-1 levels predict 3-year survival in patients who have amputation for critical leg ischaemia

D J Newton1, F Khan, M McLaren

  • 1Vascular Diseases Research Unit, Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. d.j.newton@dundee.ac.uk

Insights

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels predict mortality in critical leg ischaemia (CLI) patients. Higher ET-1 indicates increased risk of death from all causes and cardiovascular events in CLI patients.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • Critical leg ischaemia (CLI) patients often have co-existing coronary heart disease, a major contributor to mortality.
  • Identifying predictive markers for mortality in CLI is crucial for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate endothelial function markers as predictors of mortality in patients with critical leg ischaemia.
  • To determine if specific biomarkers can identify CLI patients at higher risk of death.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 39 CLI patients scheduled for lower-limb amputation was studied.
  • Blood levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, homocysteine, endothelin-1 (ET-1), von Willebrand factor, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 were measured.
  • Forearm vascular responses to acetylcholine, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Significantly higher levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) were observed in patients who died within 3 years compared to survivors (P = 0.002).
  • Cox regression analysis identified ET-1 as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 3.53; P = 0.007).
  • ET-1 also independently predicted cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio 4.15; P = 0.014).

Conclusions:

  • Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with critical leg ischaemia (CLI).
  • Measuring ET-1 levels may aid in risk stratification for CLI patients.
  • These findings highlight the role of endothelial dysfunction in CLI outcomes.
Abstract