Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A new approach to sample size calculation for reference interval studies.

C Jennen-Steinmetz1, S Wellek

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, D-68072 Mannheim, Germany. jennen@zi-mannheim.de

Statistics in Medicine
|September 29, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany after 20 Years - Quality Assurance of Ultrasound Examinations during First Trimester Screening.

Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)·2022
Same author

Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Prenatal Risk Calculation (PRC) 3.0: An Extended DoE-Based First-Trimester Screening Algorithm Allowing For Early Blood Sampling.

Ultrasound international open·2016
Same author

Erratum: Pashaj et al. Normal Doppler Reference Values of the Pericallosal Artery. Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 375-80.

Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)·2015
Same author

Normal Doppler Reference Values of the Pericallosal Artery.

Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)·2015
Same author

A comparison of region-of-interest measures for extracting whole brain data using survival analysis in alcoholism as an example.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2015
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new criterion for calculating sample size needed for establishing reference intervals. It ensures empirical coverage matches target values within specified probability limits, aiding accurate clinical reference range determination.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Laboratory Science
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Establishing accurate reference intervals is crucial for clinical diagnosis and monitoring.
  • Current methods for sample size determination may not adequately account for desired precision and confidence.
  • Univariate reference limits are widely used but require robust sample size calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel criterion for determining the sample size required for establishing reference intervals.
  • To provide a framework for ensuring the empirical coverage of reference regions meets target values with high probability.
  • To facilitate accurate and reliable estimation of clinical reference ranges.

Main Methods:

  • A new criterion based on comparing empirical coverage with target values and probability limits (delta1, delta2, beta).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Derivation of implicit formulae for sample size (n) for parametric and distribution-free methods.
  • Development of explicit approximation formulae for symmetric specifications of (delta1, delta2).
  • Numerical techniques to generate exact values presented in tables for practical applications.

    • Main Results:

    • Implicit and explicit formulae relating sample size to design parameters (delta1, delta2, beta) were derived.
    • Tables of exact sample sizes for various recommended specifications of delta1, delta2, and beta are provided.
    • The proposed method is applicable to both one- and two-sided reference intervals.

    Conclusions:

    • The new criterion offers a statistically sound approach to sample size determination for reference intervals.
    • The derived formulae and tables provide practical tools for researchers and clinicians.
    • This work enhances the reliability of reference interval studies, impacting diagnostic accuracy.