The role of envelope fluctuations in an apparent demonstration of suppression in simultaneous masking

Fastl and Bechly [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 754-757 (1983)] reported that the threshold of a brief 900-Hz signal simultaneously masked by a band of noise. 100 Hz wide, centered at 1000 Hz, was reduced by approximately 8 dB by the addition of an 1150-Hz tone having a level of 20 dB above that of the narrow-band masker. They concluded that this decrease in threshold was a demonstration of suppression in simultaneous masking. Here it is argued that Fastl and Bechly's results simply reflect the poorer detectability of signals masked by higher-frequency fluctuating maskers (their narrow-band masker) than by relatively flat-envelope maskers (their composite narrow-band plus tonal masker). The results of three experiments support the masker-envelope explanation. In the first experiment, as in the report of Fastl and Bechly, the masker centered at 1000 Hz (M1) was a narrow-band noise and the masker centered at 1150 Hz (M2) was a tone. Fastl and Bechly's result was replicated. However, thresholds obtained when M1 was presented alone (the M1-only condition) were more affected by the starting level of the signal within each adaptive track than were thresholds obtained when M1 and M2 were presented together (the M1+M2 condition). This result paralleled a previous report that starting level influenced performance more with fluctuating than with flat-envelope maskers. For the four of seven subjects wh showed learning, there was also more improvement in the M1-only than in the M1 + M2 condition. In the second experiment, M1 was a tone and M2 was a narrow-band noise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)