Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving fairness in coverage decisions: performance expectations for quality improvement.

Matthew K Wynia1, Deborah Cummins, David Fleming

  • 1American Medical Association, USA.

The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB
|September 30, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to Open Peer Commentaries: "Principlistic Equality: The Relative Importance of the Four Principles Among Primary and Urgent Care Clinicians".

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Caring for Individual Patients to Catalyze Organizational Equity.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Thermophilization over space but not time among communities of ground-dwelling arthropods in a desert city.

Ecology·2026
Same author

Principlistic Equality: The Relative Importance of the Four Principles Among Primary and Urgent Care Clinicians.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

Organizational Factors that Impact Trust in Healing Relationships: A Qualitative Study.

Journal of general internal medicine·2025
Same author

When are health professionals ethically obligated to engage in public advocacy?

Lancet (London, England)·2025

The Ethical Force Program developed tools to improve fairness in health care benefits design and administration. These tools offer ethical criteria and measurable expectations for health plans and other organizations.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Ethics
  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Patient and physician perceptions of unfairness in healthcare coverage decisions are prevalent.
  • Existing healthcare systems face challenges in transparent and ethical benefits design.
  • There is a need for standardized ethical criteria in health benefits administration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address perceived unfairness in healthcare coverage decisions.
  • To develop quality improvement tools for ethical healthcare practices.
  • To establish ethical criteria for fair health benefits design and administration.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the Ethical Force Program.
  • Creation of five content areas specifying ethical criteria.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulation of concrete recommendations and measurable expectations for performance improvement.

    • Main Results:

    • Five content areas outlining ethical criteria for fair health benefits design and administration have been developed.
    • The program provides actionable recommendations for organizations.
    • Measurable expectations for performance improvement are included.

    Conclusions:

    • The Ethical Force Program offers a framework for improving the ethical design and administration of health benefits.
    • These tools can enhance fairness and transparency in healthcare coverage decisions.
    • Stakeholders involved in benefits design and administration can utilize these resources for quality improvement.