Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Three-dimensional surface imaging: limitations and considerations from the anthropometric perspective.

Seth M Weinberg1, John C Kolar

  • 1Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Division of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. smwst46@sdmgenetics.pitt.edu

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|September 30, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comprehensive analysis of <i>de novo</i> variants across 2,497 orofacial cleft trios reveals novel genetic drivers of disease.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Quantification and visualization of 3D facial aging in individuals of European ancestry.

GeroScience·2026
Same author

Geometric Morphometric-Based Estimation as an Aid for Naso-Orbito-Ethmoidal Trauma Management.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Trio-based GWAS reveals novel loci associated with different forms of isolated cleft lip.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Leveraging the genetics of human face shape boosts the discovery of orofacial cleft risk loci.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Is 7p14.1 an orofacial cleft risk locus? Genome-wide study of copy number variation in multiple populations provides both a replication of previous studies and an alternative explanation.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging offers valuable clinical measurements but requires careful consideration of its limitations. This report examines the strengths and weaknesses of 3D surface-based anthropometry for head and face measurements.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Anthropometry
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging technology is increasingly accessible for clinical applications.
  • 3D surface-based anthropometry presents unique measurement challenges and limitations.
  • Accurate quantitative data from head and face regions is crucial in many clinical contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the application of 3D surface imaging in anthropometry.
  • To identify and discuss the limitations and methodological considerations of 3D surface imaging for head and face measurements.
  • To provide guidance on the appropriate use of 3D surface imaging for reliable quantitative data capture.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on 3D surface imaging in anthropometry.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of potential sources of error and limitations in 3D surface data acquisition.
  • Focus on anthropometric measurements of the head and face.

    • Main Results:

    • 3D surface imaging offers significant potential for clinical measurements.
    • Methodological caveats and limitations must be addressed for reliable quantitative data.
    • Specific challenges exist in capturing accurate head and face anthropometric data.

    Conclusions:

    • 3D surface imaging is a powerful tool but requires careful methodological consideration.
    • Understanding the strengths and weaknesses is essential for accurate anthropometric assessment.
    • Further research and standardized protocols are needed for optimal application in head and face measurements.