Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Rescue of Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus from cDNA
Published on: October 12, 2013
Comparison of avian cell substrates for propagating subtype C avian metapneumovirus
Byung-Whi Kong1, Linda K Foster, Douglas N Foster
1Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, 495 AnSci/VetMed, 1988 Fitch Ave., St. Paul, 55108, USA.
Abstract:
Avian metapneumovirus (AMPV) is a respiratory viral pathogen that causes turkey rhinotracheitis (TRT) or swollen head syndrome (SHS) in chickens. AMPV was first isolated in South Africa during the early 1970s and has subsequently spread worldwide during the 1980s to include Europe, Asia, and South America. In 1996, a genetically distinct AMPV subgroup C was isolated in the US following an outbreak of TRT. Vero cells are currently the best available substrate for AMPV propagation but are of non-avian origin. A number of different avian cell substrates have been compared to determine which is the most suitable for the propagation of AMPV to sufficiently high titers. Of the cell substrates tested, primary turkey turbinate and kidney and chicken kidney cells produced titers equal to or greater than Vero cells. Turkey turbinate and kidney epithelial cells that were life-span extended by the ectopic expression of human telomerase catalytic subunit (HTERT) initially displayed AMPV titers comparable to Vero cell controls, but declined in virus production with increased passage in culture. Interestingly, plaques emanating from Vero propagated virus were relatively small and dispersed, when analyzed by immunofluorescent assays (IFA), while both turkey turbinate and kidney cell propagated AMPV produced larger plaques. Even with these differences, there were no changes in the predicted amino acid sequences of the nucleocapsid (N) and phosphoprotein (P) genes of AMPV propagated in either turkey turbinate or Vero host cells. However, the fusion (F) gene showed 11 amino acid differences (98.7% identity) between the two host cell types. These results suggest that AMPV propagated in homologous avian cellular substrates may produce more infectious virus with possibly more effective fusion activity, compared to Vero cell propagation.
Insights
Avian metapneumovirus (AMPV) propagation in avian cells like turkey turbinate and kidney cells yields higher virus titers than non-avian Vero cells. This suggests homologous cell substrates may enhance AMPV infectivity and fusion activity.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Virology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Avian metapneumovirus (AMPV) causes significant respiratory disease in poultry, including turkey rhinotracheitis (TRT) and swollen head syndrome (SHS).
- Current propagation methods rely on Vero cells, which are of non-avian origin, prompting research into more suitable avian cell substrates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate various avian cell substrates for optimal propagation of Avian metapneumovirus (AMPV).
- To compare AMPV propagation efficiency and characteristics in avian cells versus the standard Vero cell line.
Main Methods:
- Propagation of AMPV in primary turkey turbinate, turkey kidney, and chicken kidney cells.
- Comparison of virus titers, plaque morphology via immunofluorescent assays (IFA), and genetic analysis of key viral genes (N, P, F).
- Assessment of life-span extended avian cells expressing human telomerase catalytic subunit (HTERT) for AMPV propagation.
Main Results:
- Primary turkey turbinate and kidney cells, along with chicken kidney cells, achieved AMPV titers equal to or greater than Vero cells.
- AMPV propagated in avian cells produced larger plaques compared to smaller, dispersed plaques from Vero-propagated virus.
- While N and P genes remained consistent, the F gene showed 11 amino acid differences in AMPV propagated in turkey cells versus Vero cells.
Conclusions:
- Homologous avian cell substrates, particularly turkey turbinate and kidney cells, are superior for propagating AMPV compared to Vero cells.
- Avian cell propagation may lead to more infectious virus with enhanced fusion activity due to observed genetic differences in the F gene.
More Related Videos
10:32A Miniaturized Glycan Microarray Assay for Assessing Avidity and Specificity of Influenza A Virus Hemagglutinins
Published on: May 29, 2016
08:10Production of High-Titer Infectious Influenza Pseudotyped Particles with Envelope Glycoproteins from Highly Pathogenic H5N1 and Avian H7N9 Viruses
Published on: January 15, 2020