Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic.

Mani Menon1, Alok Shrivastava, Ashutosh Tewari

  • 1Vattikuti Urology Institute, The Josephine Ford Cancer Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA. scomisk1@hfhs.org

Urology
|October 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Robotic radical prostatectomy offers improved outcomes for prostate cancer surgery compared to open or laparoscopic methods. Further research and cost-effectiveness are needed for wider adoption.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reproducibility of MRI Radiomics Measurements in Men with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Happening in the Prostate Tumor Microenvironment: Ion Channels and Extrachromosomal DNA Driving Phenotypic Plasticity.

The Prostate·2026
Same author

A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies on Youth Internet Behavior Using the Positive Youth Development Frameworks.

Journal of adolescence·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Utility of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies Across the Prostate Cancer Spectrum.

The Prostate·2025
Same author

Predicting side-specific extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer using an 18F-DCFPyL PSMA-PET/CT-based nomogram.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2025
Same author

Diagnostic Accuracy of [<sup>18</sup>F]-DCFPyL Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: Is Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Still Necessary?

The Journal of urology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Prostate cancer is a leading diagnosis in men.
  • Radical prostatectomy is effective for localized disease but can be invasive.
  • Minimally invasive techniques like laparoscopic and robotic surgery offer alternatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy with open and conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
  • To evaluate functional recovery (urinary and sexual) and operative results.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective data collection over 4 years.
  • Comparison of 100 open, 50 laparoscopic, and 500 robotic radical prostatectomies.
  • Standardized assessment of urinary and sexual function pre- and post-operatively.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Robotic surgery showed lower odds ratios for operative time, blood loss, pain, and complications.
  • Median times to urinary continence and sexual activity resumption were shorter with robotic surgery.
  • Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches demonstrated favorable outcomes compared to open surgery.

Conclusions:

  • Conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a viable alternative to open surgery.
  • Robotic radical prostatectomy may offer superior surgical outcomes.
  • Wider adoption requires cost reduction, expertise dissemination, and randomized trials.