Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Determining anaerobic capacity using treadmill ergometry.

H Striegel1, F Emde, N Ploog

  • 1Medical Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Sports Medicine, University of Tuebingen, Germany. heiko.striegel@uni-tuebingen.de

International Journal of Sports Medicine
|October 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do habitual foot-strike patterns in running influence functional Achilles tendon properties during gait?

Journal of sports sciences·2019
Same author

[Sports cardiology : Overview of relevant clinical topics].

Herz·2017
Same author

Using Thorax Expansion to Detect a Ventilatory Inflection Point in the Field.

International journal of sports medicine·2015
Same author

Achilles tendon loading patterns during barefoot walking and slow running on a treadmill: An ultrasonic propagation study.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2015
Same author

A wearable respiratory monitoring device--the between-days variability of calibration.

International journal of sports medicine·2014
Same author

Deficits 10-years after Achilles tendon repair.

International journal of sports medicine·2012
Same journal

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

International journal of sports medicine·2026
Same journal

Exercise Intensity Effects on Irisin in Master Athletes and Links With Maximal Oxygen Uptake and Body Fat.

International journal of sports medicine·2026
Same journal

Evolution of the Australian Institute of Sport Supplement Program over the last 25 years.

International journal of sports medicine·2026
Same journal

Preseason Passive Torque Asymmetries in Soccer Players with Hamstring Strain Injury.

International journal of sports medicine·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal Burden in German Equestrians: Hip-Specific Symptoms and Risk Factors.

International journal of sports medicine·2026
Same journal

Trans-inclusion in sports: history, scientific evidence and future directions.

International journal of sports medicine·2026
See all related articles

Treadmill ergometry has methodological issues for determining anaerobic capacity (AC). While this modified procedure differentiates training levels, it underestimates absolute AC values compared to bicycle ergometry.

Area of Science:

  • Sports Science
  • Exercise Physiology
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Determining anaerobic capacity (AC) via treadmill ergometry presents significant methodological and technical challenges.
  • Existing protocols may not accurately reflect true AC due to factors like horizontal work calculation and sprint test duration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adapt and evaluate a modified Monod and Scherrer procedure for assessing anaerobic capacity (AC) in individuals with varying training backgrounds.
  • To investigate the accuracy and limitations of treadmill-based AC determination.

Main Methods:

  • Three groups (untrained, aerobic-trained, anaerobic-trained) underwent VO2max and individual anaerobic threshold (IAT) assessments.
  • Subjects performed incremental speed sprints above VO2max; work output was calculated.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Linear regression determined global AC from sprint data.

    • Main Results:

    • Aerobic-trained (AeT) subjects exhibited higher VO2max and IAT compared to untrained (UT) and anaerobic-trained (AnT) groups.
    • Anaerobic capacity (AC) was significantly higher in AnT (4.1 kJ) than AeT (1.8 kJ) and UT (3.2 kJ).
    • Treadmill-derived AC values were lower than those from bicycle ergometry, influenced by horizontal work, sprint duration, critical velocity, and group endurance.

    Conclusions:

    • The modified treadmill protocol can differentiate between individuals with different training statuses regarding anaerobic capacity.
    • The absolute quantification of anaerobic capacity using this treadmill method is inaccurate and likely underestimated.
    • Further research is needed to refine treadmill-based methods for precise AC measurement.