Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Error detection in anatomic pathology.

Richard J Zarbo1, Frederick A Meier, Stephen S Raab

  • 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|October 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interpretive Diagnostic Error Reduction: Guideline Update from the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Subspecialty Pathology.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Paenibacillus spp infection among infants with postinfectious hydrocephalus in Uganda: an observational case-control study.

The Lancet. Microbe·2023
Same author

Building Perinatal Pathology Research Capacity in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Frontiers in medicine·2022
Same author

The Unsafe Archaic Processes of Tissue Pathology.

American journal of clinical pathology·2022
Same author

Cytomegalovirus infections in infants in Uganda: Newborn-mother pairs, neonates with sepsis, and infants with hydrocephalus.

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases·2022
Same author

Vaginal microbiome topic modeling of laboring Ugandan women with and without fever.

NPJ biofilms and microbiomes·2021
Same journal

Assessing Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Urothelial Carcinoma: Insights From Clinical Practice Into Scoring Criteria, Histologic Subtypes, and Genomic Characteristics Across Disease Sites.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Cross-Reactivity of TPIT Antibody Clone OTI2G1 in Chordoma: Structural Mechanisms and Diagnostic Implications.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Paracoccidioidomycosis at Autopsy: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of Cytology Diagnosis for Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Assessment by the College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Slide Program.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Serum Immunofixation Electrophoresis Guidance Conflict: A Call to Harmonize.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

In Reply.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Standardizing anatomic pathology error classification is crucial for accurate measurement and clinical impact assessment. A proposed taxonomy shows high agreement, enabling better error reduction strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Pathology Quality Improvement
  • Healthcare Error Analysis

Background:

  • Anatomic pathology plays a critical role in patient diagnosis and treatment.
  • Current methods for defining and measuring errors in anatomic pathology lack standardization.
  • This variability hinders the assessment of error frequency and clinical impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define the scope of errors in anatomic pathology.
  • To propose a standardized classification scheme for anatomic pathology errors.
  • To identify quality assurance (QA) procedures for error reduction.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a literature search of PubMed and College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies.
  • Evaluated surgical pathology report defects using a validated error taxonomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performed a comparative review of QA procedures for error reduction.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in error definitions and practices impede inter-study comparisons.
    • Observer redundancy, like double-reading, reduces diagnostic variation, with error rates from 1.2 to 50 per 1000 cases.
    • The proposed error taxonomy demonstrated high interobserver agreement (91.4%) across identification, specimen, interpretation, and reporting variables.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized tools are needed to reliably measure anatomic pathology errors and their clinical impact.
    • A proposed standardized error classification can enable measurement of error frequencies and the effectiveness of QA efforts.
    • The efficacy of traditional QA methods like double-reading, case conferences, and consultations requires objective evaluation.