Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anatomic pathology databases and patient safety.

Stephen S Raab1, Dana M Grzybicki, Richard J Zarbo

  • 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center/Shadyside, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA. raabss@msx.upmc.edu

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|October 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interpretive Diagnostic Error Reduction: Guideline Update from the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Subspecialty Pathology.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Self-rated work ability predicts return to work after occupational rehabilitation.

Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences·2026
Same author

Inpatient or Outpatient Occupational Rehabilitation - What Works Best for Whom? A Non-randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Young adults not in education, employment, or training (NEET): a global scoping review.

BMC public health·2025
Same author

Evaluating the Economic Impact of Novel Oncology Drug Coverage Through Patient Assistance Programs.

JCO oncology practice·2024
Same author

Virtual Reality Gaming in Occupational Rehabilitation - User Experiences and Perceptions.

Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare·2024
Same journal

Assessing Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Urothelial Carcinoma: Insights From Clinical Practice Into Scoring Criteria, Histologic Subtypes, and Genomic Characteristics Across Disease Sites.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Cross-Reactivity of TPIT Antibody Clone OTI2G1 in Chordoma: Structural Mechanisms and Diagnostic Implications.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Paracoccidioidomycosis at Autopsy: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of Cytology Diagnosis for Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Assessment by the College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Slide Program.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Serum Immunofixation Electrophoresis Guidance Conflict: A Call to Harmonize.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

In Reply.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

A national anatomic pathology error database can track discrepancies and guide quality improvement. This study established benchmarks for error frequency and identified key areas for patient safety interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Anatomic pathology
  • Patient safety
  • Healthcare quality improvement

Background:

  • The clinical utility of anatomic pathology discrepancies requires further investigation.
  • Establishing benchmarks for error frequency is crucial for improving patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the utility of databases in studying anatomic pathology patient safety.
  • To establish benchmarks for error frequency and identify high-impact errors for targeted interventions.

Main Methods:

  • A national anatomic pathology errors database was created, funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  • Four institutions reported cytologic-histologic correlation error data, with standardized correlation methods.
  • Root cause analysis was performed to identify error sources, informing the development of error reduction plans.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlation error frequencies ranged from 0.17% to 0.63%.
  • Lung and urinary bladder specimens showed the highest non-gynecologic discrepancy frequencies.
  • Most detected errors were classified as no-harm events, with root cause analysis identifying clinical and pathology-related error sources.

Conclusions:

  • A multi-institutional anatomic pathology error database can effectively benchmark practices.
  • Targeting high-frequency or high-clinical-impact errors is feasible.
  • Error reduction programs developed through this database have significant national implications for patient safety.