Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The National Practitioner Data Bank: an introduction.

E K Jeffer1

  • 1Army National Guard, National Guard Bureau, Alexandria, VA 22302-1454.

Military Medicine
|June 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Command of military medical units: grounding the paradigm.

Military medicine·1996
Same author

Medical exercises by the National Guard for underserved Americans.

Military medicine·1996
Same author

Medical triage in the post-Cold War era.

Military medicine·1994
Same author

Against medical advice: Part I, A review of the literature.

Military medicine·1993
Same author

Against medical advice: Part II, The Army experience 1971-1988.

Military medicine·1993
Same author

Quality assurance and quality improvement: the 1990s and beyond.

Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality·1992
Same journal

Feasibility of a Condensed Training Program Enabling Combat Medics to Acquire Telemedicine-Ready E-FAST Images: A Prospective Pilot Educational Intervention.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

Dry Needling in the Military Health System: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

A Comparative Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinical Experts for Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Austere Environments.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

Making the Invisible Wounds of War Visible.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

Impact of Intradermal Fixation on Epidural Catheter Durability and Dislodgement Rates.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

Bridging the Military-Academic Medicine Divide: The Value, Evaluate, and Train Strategic Framework for Physician Workforce Development.

Military medicine·2026
See all related articles

The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) was created to improve healthcare quality and accountability. This analysis reviews NPDB operations, safeguards, and potential improvements for practitioner data reporting.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare policy
  • Medical regulation
  • Public health administration

Background:

  • The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) was mandated by law to enhance healthcare quality and accountability.
  • Its implementation has generated significant concern within the medical community regarding practitioner data reporting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the origin, development, and operational framework of the NPDB.
  • To evaluate Army implementation procedures concerning practitioner safeguards and patient protection.
  • To identify potential issues and areas for future research related to the NPDB.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the NPDB's legislative origin and historical development.
  • Analysis of operational procedures, with a focus on Army implementation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of practitioner safeguards and patient protection measures within the NPDB system.
  • Main Results:

    • The NPDB's creation and operation have caused anxiety among medical practitioners.
    • Army implementation procedures are designed to protect practitioners while aligning with patient safety goals.
    • Specific challenges and avenues for future research have been identified.

    Conclusions:

    • The NPDB's framework requires ongoing evaluation to balance practitioner concerns with public health objectives.
    • Potential solutions, such as linking entries to the standard of care or establishing financial thresholds, warrant further investigation.
    • Refinements in NPDB reporting mechanisms are crucial for maintaining trust and efficiency in medical practice.