Epidiaphyseal versus other intercalary allografts for tumors of the lower limb

Epidiaphyseal intercalary reconstruction has become possible for bone tumors that extend into the epiphysis because advances in magnetic resonance imaging and chemotherapy allow close resection while sparing the juxtaarticular bone and joint. In a retrospective study, we questioned whether epidiaphyseal reconstructions around the knee had a clinical outcome (measured as long-term survival, complication rate, and functional score) comparable with metadiaphyseal and diaphyseal reconstructions. Between 1988 and 1999, 14 epidiaphyseal, nine metaphyseal, and 12 diaphyseal reconstructions were done, and the median followup was 7.2 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 10-year survival rate of 79% for epidiaphyseal reconstructions, which did not differ from an 89% rate for metadiaphyseal and a 75% rate for diaphyseal reconstructions. Epidiaphyseal complications included two infections, five fractures, and three nonunion treatments. Complications for all 35 grafts included three infections, 12 fractures, and nine nonunion treatments. Ultimately, six grafts failed, with infection and length of resection as predisposing factors. All epiphyseal osteotomies had tumor-free margins and no local recurrences. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score for each type of intercalary reconstruction was between 23 and 24. Because the epidiaphyseal reconstruction avoids complications associated with joint reconstruction and the results are comparable with those of other types of intercalary grafts, these reconstructions should be considered if at least 1 cm of tumor-free juxtaarticular bone can be maintained.