Visual estimation versus quantitative assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison by

Burkhard Sievers1, Simon Kirchberg, Ulrich Franken

  • 1Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Marienhospital, University of Bochum, Herne, Germany. burkhard.sievers@gmx.de

American Heart Journal
|October 8, 2005
PubMed

Insights

Visual estimation underestimates left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to quantitative assessment. Quantitative methods are required for accurate LVEF analysis, while visual assessment offers rapid, less precise evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Diagnostic Techniques

Background:

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a key indicator of cardiac function.
  • Accurate LVEF assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing heart conditions.
  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a primary tool for cardiac assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare visual and quantitative methods for assessing LVEF.
  • To evaluate LVEF in normal subjects and patients with impaired left ventricular function.
  • To determine the accuracy and variability of visual versus quantitative LVEF assessment.

Main Methods:

  • 100 subjects (normal, ischemic cardiomyopathy, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) underwent 1.5-T CMR.
  • Standard short-axis views were acquired using a fast gradient-echo sequence.
  • LVEF was calculated using the Simpson rule; visual and quantitative assessments were compared by two blinded observers.

Main Results:

  • Visual LVEF estimation significantly underestimated quantitative LVEF across all groups.
  • Underestimation was greater in normal subjects compared to cardiomyopathy patients.
  • Quantitative assessment demonstrated lower interobserver variability than visual estimation.

Conclusions:

  • Visual LVEF assessment consistently underestimates the true ejection fraction.
  • Quantitative assessment using the standard short-axis method provides superior accuracy.
  • Visual estimation may suffice for rapid clinical assessments where precision is less critical.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography01:17

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography

Cardiac imaging studies encompass a wide range of noninvasive and minimally invasive techniques designed to visualize the heart's structure and function in detail. One such technique is echocardiography, which uses high-frequency ultrasound waves to produce detailed images of the heart, known as echocardiograms.
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography

Echocardiography plays a role in assessing cardiac health and detecting heart conditions, with various types providing critical insights for diagnosis and treatment.
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI01:21

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, or CMRI, is a non-invasive diagnostic test that employs a magnetic field and radiofrequency waves to create precise images of the heart and arteries. It provides comprehensive information about cardiac anatomy, function, perfusion, and tissue characterization without ionizing radiation.IndicationsCMRI diagnoses various heart conditions, including tissue damage from heart attacks, ischemic heart disease, myocarditis, aortic issues (tears, aneurysms,...