Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task
Petter Johansson1, Lars Hall, Sverker Sikström
1Lund University Cognitive Science, Lund University, Kungshuset Lundagård, 222 22 Lund, Sweden.
Abstract:
A fundamental assumption of theories of decision-making is that we detect mismatches between intention and outcome, adjust our behavior in the face of error, and adapt to changing circumstances. Is this always the case? We investigated the relation between intention, choice, and introspection. Participants made choices between presented face pairs on the basis of attractiveness, while we covertly manipulated the relationship between choice and outcome that they experienced. Participants failed to notice conspicuous mismatches between their intended choice and the outcome they were presented with, while nevertheless offering introspectively derived reasons for why they chose the way they did. We call this effect choice blindness.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
Hindsight Biases
Fundamental Attribution Error
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...