Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an evolution in surgery.

F J Bianco1, B Guillonneau

  • 1Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Minerva Chirurgica
|October 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: From diagnosis to ablation.

Actas urologicas espanolas·2026
Same author

[PET/CT and biochemical recurrence of prostate adenocarcinoma: Added value of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 when <sup>18</sup>F-fluorocholine is non-contributive].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2017
Same author

Focalyx Dx, Bx, Tx et Apps: A novel contemporary fusion paradigm for the management of prostate cancer.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2016
Same author

[Neurological and vascular preservation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2010
Same author

[Teaching laparoscopic urologic oncology. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience].

Actas urologicas espanolas·2006
Same author

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a review of techniques and results worldwide.

Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology·2004
Same journal

Ongoing clinical trials on axillary management.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

Axillary management after neoadjuvant treatment.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

Axillary observation alone versus sentinel node biopsy: past, present and future perspectives.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

Patient flow for the management of ostomy patients.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

The management of "fragile" and suspected COVID-19 surgical patients during pandemic: an Italian single-center experience.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

Emergency laparoscopic treatment of complicated parastomal hernias.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
See all related articles

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is now a standard procedure, offering reduced recovery and blood loss without compromising cancer control. Ongoing research aims to validate its long-term efficacy through rigorous studies.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) emerged in the late 1990s as a novel surgical approach.
  • Initially met with skepticism, LRP has become a widely adopted standard at specialized centers globally.
  • It is recognized as a technically demanding but systematically performable laparoscopic procedure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the evolving role and outcomes of LRP in prostate cancer treatment.
  • To compare LRP's functional and oncological results with traditional open surgery.
  • To emphasize the need for prospective, randomized trials to solidify LRP's evidence base.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic application of standard laparoscopic techniques for radical prostatectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Monitoring of operative blood loss, convalescence periods, and surgical margin status.
  • Assessment of long-term oncological outcomes, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence rates.
  • Evaluation of early quality of life data concerning urinary and sexual function.

    • Main Results:

    • LRP demonstrates significantly lower operative blood loss and shorter convalescence compared to open procedures.
    • Early oncological outcomes, including positive surgical margin rates and PSA recurrence-free rates, are encouraging.
    • Postoperative urinary and sexual function quality of life appears comparable to open surgery series.

    Conclusions:

    • LRP offers clear advantages in terms of recovery and blood loss without compromising cancer control.
    • Maturing long-term data suggest favorable oncological and functional outcomes.
    • Further prospective, randomized studies are crucial to rigorously evaluate LRP techniques and outcomes, advancing the field.