A controlled sequential evaluation of open donor nephrectomy versus classical and modified laparoscopic donor...

This study sought to determine the procedure of choice for kidney retrieval for transplantation by comparing open donor nephrectomy to laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and by analyzing intraoperative donor and recipient graft function parameters. In this single-center, controlled, sequential analysis, 100 consecutive donor-recipient pairs were recruited, grouped according to surgical procedure, and operated upon between 1997 to 2004, as follows: group 1, open donor nephrectomy (n = 30), performed from 1997 to 2000; group 2, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 28), performed from 2000 to 2002; and group 3, modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 42), performed from 2002 to 2004. Data were analyzed by type of operative procedure, graft function, length of hospital stay, and donor recovery time. Operative time was similar for all three surgical approaches. Warm ischemia times for open donor nephrectomy and modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy were similar. Acute tubular necrosis occurred in 7% of patients in all groups. Donor recovery and lengths of hospital stay were significantly shorter for laparoscopic approaches. Donor complications were similar in numbers, differing only in complication type. Graft function and survival were similar for all three surgical approaches. We conclude that modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is the procedure of choice for living kidney retrieval.