Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Even conservation rules are made to be broken: implications for biodiversity.

Paul Robbins1, Kendra McSweeney, Thomas Waite

  • 1Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona, 437B Harvill Building, Tucson, Arizona, 85716, USA. robbins@email.arizona.edu

Environmental Management
|October 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Centenarian SIRT6 variants elevate SIRT6 protein and enhance cellular senescence resistance.

Research square·2026
Same author

Charting human cellular senescence in aging and disease.

Cell·2026
Same author

Correlation between recognition of autologous tumor organoids by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from metastatic epithelial cancers and clinical response.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2026
Same author

Vaccination rescues dysfunctional T cell therapy by amplifying rare stem-like antitumor CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells.

Research square·2026
Same author

Artifacts in spatial transcriptomics data: their detection, importance, prevalence, and prevention.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Intramuscular DNA vaccine provides protection in non-human primate and mouse models of SARS-CoV-2.

Frontiers in immunology·2025
Same journal

Integrating Community Perception, Climate Vulnerability Index, and Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Approaches for Climate Risk Assessment of the Persepolis World Heritage Site.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

How are Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Revolutionizing Forest Operations? A Systematic Review of Current Applications and Future Opportunities.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

Environmental Justice in Urban River Restoration Efforts.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

Perceived Effects of Agri-Environmental Management Practices on Public Good Delivery.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

Carbon Sequestration Dynamics and Ecosystem Service Valuation in the Borana Rangeland, Southern Ethiopia: Linking Ecology and Carbon Finance.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Modeling to Inform Environmental Management.

Environmental management·2026
See all related articles

Human impacts in conservation areas, like poaching and encroachment, are common. Surprisingly, rule-breaking may enhance floral diversity, warranting further study.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Conservation Biology
  • Environmental Social Science

Background:

  • Conservation zones face ongoing human impacts despite enclosure efforts.
  • These impacts stem from rule violations such as poaching and agricultural encroachment.
  • The spatial and temporal patterns of human disturbance within conservation areas remain poorly understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current knowledge on ecological disturbance and conservation noncompliance.
  • To explore the differential implications of various noncompliance forms on biodiversity.
  • To advocate for empirical research on human impacts and their ecological consequences.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of ecological disturbance and conservation noncompliance.
  • Analysis of how different types of rule-breaking affect biodiversity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of existing knowledge to identify research gaps.

    • Main Results:

    • Different forms of noncompliance have varied implications for biodiversity.
    • Anthropogenic disturbances resulting from rule violations may potentially maintain or enhance floral diversity.
    • There is a significant lack of spatially and temporally explicit data on these disturbances.

    Conclusions:

    • Conservation noncompliance can have complex ecological effects, potentially benefiting floral diversity.
    • Further empirical investigation into these human-wildlife-environment interactions is crucial.
    • Interdisciplinary collaboration between conservation biologists and social scientists is needed to understand these dynamics.