Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cardiopulmonary support.

P S Teirstein1

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, California.

The American Journal of Cardiology
|May 7, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Cardiopulmonary support (CPS) aids high-risk cardiology patients. Standby CPS and prophylactic CPS showed similar success rates, but prophylactic use led to more procedural complications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The platelet function dose-response to abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization is variable.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2001
Same author

New frontiers in interventional cardiology: intravascular radiation to prevent restenosis.

Circulation·2001
Same author

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of enoxaparin after high-risk coronary stenting: the ATLAST trial.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2001
Same author

Living the dream of no restenosis.

Circulation·2001
Same author

Brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis through the internal mammary artery.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2001
Same author

Point-of-care measured platelet inhibition correlates with a reduced risk of an adverse cardiac event after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) multicenter study.

Circulation·2001

Area of Science:

  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Support Systems

Background:

  • Cardiopulmonary support (CPS) offers an alternative for high-risk patients in interventional cardiology.
  • CPS systems provide hemodynamic support during procedures like balloon occlusions or acute vessel closure.
  • Supported angioplasty reduces preload and afterload, enabling prolonged balloon inflations in critical coronary vessels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of standby versus prophylactic cardiopulmonary support (CPS) in high-risk interventional cardiology patients.
  • To evaluate success rates, major complication rates, and procedural morbidity between the two CPS strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Patients were divided into two groups: standby CPS (initiated only upon hemodynamic compromise) and prophylactic CPS (initiated before the procedure).
  • Both groups received cardiopulmonary support during interventional cardiology procedures.
  • Outcomes assessed included procedural success, major complications, and procedural morbidity.

Main Results:

  • Standby and prophylactic CPS demonstrated comparable success rates and major complication rates.
  • Prophylactic CPS was associated with a higher incidence of procedural morbidity compared to standby CPS.
  • CPS systems are technically challenging and expensive, with significant patient morbidity.

Conclusions:

  • While both standby and prophylactic CPS are viable options for high-risk patients, standby CPS may be associated with less procedural morbidity.
  • Further research is needed to optimize patient selection for standby versus prophylactic CPS strategies.
  • Appropriate patient selection is crucial for maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risks of CPS in interventional cardiology.

Related Experiment Videos