Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026
Application of Lucilia sericata Larvae in Debridement of Pressure Wounds in Outpatient Settings
Published on: December 4, 2021
Maggot debridement therapy: free-range or contained? An in-vivo study
Pascal Steenvoorde1, Cathrien E Jacobi, Jacques Oskam
1Department of Surgery, Rijnland Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
Objective:
To determine which method of maggot debridement therapy--free-range or contained--is more effective for wound healing.
Methods:
In vivo study of 64 patients with 69 chronic wounds that showed signs of gangrenous or necrotic tissue. Patients were treated with either free-range or contained maggot debridement therapy according to maggot availability, dressing difficulty, and physician preference.
Results:
Significantly better outcomes were achieved with the free-range technique versus the contained technique (P = .028). With the free-range technique, the mean number of maggot applications and the total number of maggots per treatment were significantly lower than with the contained application technique (P = .028 and P < .001, respectively).
Conclusion:
This clinical in vivo study supports in vitro studies in which containment of maggots was found to reduce the effectiveness of maggot debridement therapy.
