Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

29.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
29.8K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

29.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
29.0K
Compensation Mechanisms01:28

Compensation Mechanisms

2.0K
The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
2.0K
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

874
Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
874
First Derivative Test: Problem Solving01:25

First Derivative Test: Problem Solving

227
Imagine an asset price that crashes to a low point, rebounds sharply as bargain-hunters step in, and then gradually declines. Such behavior can be modeled with a smooth function whose turning points represent locally overvalued and undervalued regions. A convenient example that captures rebound followed by decay is:The high and low points of this curve are identified using the first derivative test, which determines where the function changes from increasing to decreasing or vice versa. To...
227
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

236
Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem:...
236

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medicaid Expansion and Mortality Among Formerly Incarcerated Individuals.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same author

Primary Care Access and the Role of Telemedicine for Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same author

Hospital-Medicare Advantage vertical integration and medical loss ratios.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Hospital-Medicare Advantage Vertical Consolidation, 1980 to 2024.

Medical care research and review : MCRR·2026
Same author

Test Ordering and Completion During Virtual vs In-Person Annual Visits.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Billing of Medicare's G2211 Longitudinal Care Code Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

WHO Issues Guidelines for Treating Ebola and Marburg Viruses.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

FDA Approves Additional Naloxone Nasal Spray for Opioid Overdose.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

HIV May Hide in More Cells Than Previously Thought-Here's What That Could Mean for a Cure.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

US Dietary Supplement Use Increasing, Especially in Older Adults.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Heat Stress From Climate Change Surges Globally.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Strength Training Linked With Lower Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women.

JAMA·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

12.7K

Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice.

Meredith B Rosenthal1, Richard G Frank, Zhonghe Li

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass 02115, USA. meredith_rosenthal@harvard.edu

JAMA
|October 13, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pay-for-performance programs show limited healthcare quality gains. Programs often reward higher-performing physicians, potentially offering little value for the investment in quality improvement.

More Related Videos

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

26.8K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

12.7K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

26.8K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Pay-for-performance (PFP) adoption is increasing, yet research on its effectiveness in healthcare is scarce.
  • Despite optimism, empirical evidence on PFP's impact on clinical quality remains limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the effect of a physician PFP program on the quality of patient care.
  • Evaluate the impact of a PFP initiative on specific clinical process measures.

Main Methods:

  • A natural experiment design comparing California physician groups (intervention) with Pacific Northwest groups (comparison).
  • Analysis of administrative quality reports from October 2001 to April 2004 for approximately 300 physician organizations.
  • Focused on three key process measures: cervical cancer screening, mammography, and hemoglobin A1c testing.

Main Results:

  • California showed greater improvement in cervical cancer screening (5.3% vs 1.7%) compared to the Pacific Northwest, a statistically significant difference.
  • Mammography and hemoglobin A1c testing showed minimal quality improvement differences between the groups.
  • Physician groups already meeting performance thresholds received the largest share of bonus payments, despite showing the least improvement.

Conclusions:

  • A fixed PFP target may yield minimal quality improvements relative to program costs.
  • PFP programs predominantly reward clinicians with higher baseline performance, potentially limiting return on investment for quality enhancement.