Related Experiment Videos
The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data
Allen F Anderson1, James J Irrgang, Mininder S Kocher
1Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, 4230 Harding Road, 10th Floor, Nashville, TN 37205, USA. andersonaf@tnortho.com
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
|October 13, 2005
Summary
This study establishes normative data for the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, crucial for assessing knee function across diverse populations. Findings reveal scores vary significantly by age, gender, and knee problem history.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Sports Medicine
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is a key tool for evaluating knee symptoms and function.
- Normative data are essential for interpreting results from this widely used instrument.
- Existing data lacked comprehensive normative values for various knee conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish normative data for the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form.
- To aid clinicians and researchers in interpreting patient outcomes.
- To provide a benchmark for evaluating knee function in different demographics.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional survey design was employed.
- The Subjective Knee Evaluation Form was distributed to a large, representative US population sample.
- Data were collected across eight age and gender categories, stratified by census data.
Main Results:
- Complete data from 5246 knees were analyzed.
- Twenty-eight percent of participants reported knee issues.
- Mean scores varied by age and gender, with higher scores reported by individuals without knee problems.
Conclusions:
- International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form scores are influenced by age, gender, and prior knee issues.
- The established normative data enable comparison of patient function against age- and gender-matched peers.
- This facilitates more accurate clinical outcome assessment and research interpretation.