Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple imputation techniques in small sample clinical trials.

Sunni A Barnes1, Stacy R Lindborg, John W Seaman

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, and Department of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798-7140, USA. sbarnes@mayo.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|October 13, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential of IMNN-001 in epithelial ovarian cancer: assessment of clinical findings.

Expert opinion on investigational drugs·2026
Same author

Safe and durable immune responses to a single dose DNA COVID-19 vaccine in previously vaccinated or SARS-CoV-2-infected adults: A phase 1 study.

Vaccine·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "OVATION-2: A randomized phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of IMNN-001 (IL-12 gene therapy) with neo/adjuvant chemotherapy in patients newly-diagnosed with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer" [Gynecol Oncol 2025 Jun 197 182-191].

Gynecologic oncology·2025
Same author

OVATION-2: A randomized phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of IMNN-001 (IL-12 gene therapy) with neo/adjuvant chemotherapy in patients newly-diagnosed with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2025
Same author

Debamestrocel multimodal effects on biomarker pathways in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are linked to clinical outcomes.

Muscle & nerve·2024
Same author

Impact of a transitional care program for heart failure patients at Baylor Scott & White Health: a pilot study.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2024
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study evaluates multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in clinical trials. It compares their performance in small samples against traditional methods like last observation carried forward.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Attrition (missing data) complicates clinical trial analysis.
  • Ad hoc methods like case deletion or mean imputation can cause bias, especially with high missing data rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the small-sample performance of multiple imputation methods in clinical trials.
  • To compare multiple imputation against the last observation carried forward method for handling missing data.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of several multiple imputation techniques.
  • Comparison with the last observation carried forward method.
  • Analysis focused on small sample sizes typical in clinical trials.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Multiple imputation offers a statistically valid approach for handling missing data.
  • Performance of multiple imputation in small samples requires careful consideration.
  • Last observation carried forward may yield biased results.

Conclusions:

  • Multiple imputation is a robust method for addressing attrition in clinical trials.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand multiple imputation's validity in small clinical trial samples.
  • Careful selection of statistical methods is crucial for accurate clinical trial results.