Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Building face composites can harm lineup identification performance.

Gary L Wells1, Steve D Charman1, Elizabeth A Olson1

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|October 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shared and specific associations of amygdala nuclei volumes with PTSD symptom domains and childhood trauma: An ENIGMA-PGC PTSD mega-analysis.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

Medication-related suicide plans in children and adolescents: findings from crisis conversations.

Injury epidemiology·2026
Same author

Childhood Maltreatment and Deviations From Normative Brain Structure: A Mega-Analysis of 3711 Individuals From the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder and ENIGMA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Working Groups.

Biological psychiatry·2026
Same author

Planned Suicide Methods in Crisis Conversations: Effects of Age and Gender.

JAACAP open·2025
Same author

Biased lineups and additional repetitions exacerbate the repeated-suspect effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2025
Same author

Image-based meta- and mega-analysis (IBMMA): A unified framework for large-scale, multi-site, neuroimaging data analysis.

NeuroImage·2025
Same journal

Configurational antecedents of employee green behavior: A mixed methods study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

The effects of counterfactual thinking on unilateral forgiveness: Can victims do it on their own?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Gray swan neglect: Do forecasters account for low(ish) probability events?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

An inductive learning intervention to improve news veracity discernment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Forgetting and blame: When cognitive lapses excuse and when they backfire.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Predecisional distortion of risk information seen in icon arrays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
See all related articles

Creating a facial composite may impair eyewitness memory. Building a composite of a target face reduced later identification accuracy in lineup tests, even in simulated crime scenarios.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Eyewitness Testimony
  • Forensic Science

Background:

  • Face composite programs are tools used by eyewitnesses to reconstruct target faces.
  • Previous research indicates that facial composites are often poor likenesses of the original face.
  • The impact of composite generation on the eyewitness's own memory remains an area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the process of building a facial composite negatively affects an eyewitness's memory of the target face.
  • To determine if composite generation leads to reduced accuracy in subsequent identification procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving participants (n=150 and n=200) and various facial stimuli.
  • Participants either created facial composites, were exposed to composites, or had no composite exposure (control conditions).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Eyewitness memory was assessed through lineup identification tasks, including a simulated crime video.
  • Main Results:

    • Building a facial composite significantly decreased the likelihood of correctly identifying the target face in a lineup compared to control groups.
    • This memory impairment effect was observed in both direct composite creation and simulated crime contexts.
    • Composite building did not increase the rate of mistaken identifications from target-absent lineups.

    Conclusions:

    • The process of constructing a facial composite can inadvertently harm an eyewitness's memory for the original face.
    • This finding has significant implications for the use and interpretation of eyewitness-generated composites in legal and investigative settings.
    • While composite creation may reduce target identification accuracy, it does not appear to inflate false positives in identification procedures.