Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Inconsistencies in cardiac arrest reporting.

B P King1, A d'Agapeyeff, D A Gabbott

  • 1Resuscitation Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK. Ben.King@glos.nhs.uk

Resuscitation
|October 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary

In-hospital cardiac arrest data collection lacks consistency across the UK, hindering accurate auditing of resuscitation efforts and survival rates. Standardized criteria are needed for reliable data to improve patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients.

Anaesthesia·2008
Same author

Unexpectedly high block following epidural catheter placement under direct vision: a case report.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2005
Same author

The Airway Management Device (AMD) is not 'reliable and safe'.

Anaesthesia·2002
Same author

A comparison of two techniques for manual ventilation of the lungs by non-anaesthetists: the bag-valve-facemask and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) apparatus.

Anaesthesia·2001
Same author

Communication between members of the cardiac arrest team--a postal survey.

Resuscitation·2001
Same author

An evaluation of the Airway Management Device.

Anaesthesia·2001

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Clinical Auditing
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • In-hospital cardiac arrest data is crucial for staff performance audits and evaluating resuscitation techniques.
  • Current national criteria for auditing cardiac arrests are lacking, leading to inconsistent data collection.
  • Resuscitation Officers (ROs) typically collect this vital data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the consistency of recording in-hospital cardiac arrests across the United Kingdom.
  • To identify variations in how hypothetical cardiac arrest scenarios are interpreted and categorized by ROs.
  • To determine if differing inclusion/exclusion criteria influence reported survival rates.

Main Methods:

  • A questionnaire survey was distributed to ROs throughout the UK.

Related Experiment Videos

  • ROs were asked to interpret and categorize typical clinical scenarios involving cardiac arrest teams.
  • Hospitals were requested to provide survival-to-discharge rates for adult cardiac arrests.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant inconsistency was found in the auditing of in-hospital cardiac arrest events.
    • Typical events like rigor mortis were inconsistently classified as false calls or unsuccessful resuscitations.
    • Variations in data inclusion/exclusion criteria were identified as potentially influencing survival figures.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a critical need for standardized inclusion and exclusion criteria for auditing cardiac arrests in the UK.
    • Current inconsistent data collection limits the meaningfulness and utility of cardiac arrest audit data.
    • Accurate survival figures are essential for evidence-based medicine and improving cardiac arrest outcomes.