Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Ultrasonographic Assessment During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Published on: October 24, 2020
Inconsistencies in cardiac arrest reporting
B P King1, A d'Agapeyeff, D A Gabbott
1Resuscitation Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK. Ben.King@glos.nhs.uk
Insights
In-hospital cardiac arrest data collection lacks consistency across the UK, hindering accurate auditing of resuscitation efforts and survival rates. Standardized criteria are needed for reliable data to improve patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Auditing
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- In-hospital cardiac arrest data is crucial for staff performance audits and evaluating resuscitation techniques.
- Current national criteria for auditing cardiac arrests are lacking, leading to inconsistent data collection.
- Resuscitation Officers (ROs) typically collect this vital data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the consistency of recording in-hospital cardiac arrests across the United Kingdom.
- To identify variations in how hypothetical cardiac arrest scenarios are interpreted and categorized by ROs.
- To determine if differing inclusion/exclusion criteria influence reported survival rates.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire survey was distributed to ROs throughout the UK.
- ROs were asked to interpret and categorize typical clinical scenarios involving cardiac arrest teams.
- Hospitals were requested to provide survival-to-discharge rates for adult cardiac arrests.
Main Results:
- Significant inconsistency was found in the auditing of in-hospital cardiac arrest events.
- Typical events like rigor mortis were inconsistently classified as false calls or unsuccessful resuscitations.
- Variations in data inclusion/exclusion criteria were identified as potentially influencing survival figures.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need for standardized inclusion and exclusion criteria for auditing cardiac arrests in the UK.
- Current inconsistent data collection limits the meaningfulness and utility of cardiac arrest audit data.
- Accurate survival figures are essential for evidence-based medicine and improving cardiac arrest outcomes.
Abstract:
Data relating to survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest are used to audit staff performance and to help to determine whether new resuscitation techniques are effective. Individual studies into outcome from cardiac arrest have defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, but no such national criteria have been published to enable constant auditing of cardiac arrests. The aim of this survey was to investigate the consistency with which in-hospital cardiac arrests are recorded throughout the United Kingdom. Such data are, almost universally, collected by Resuscitation Officers (RO). A questionnaire was sent to ROs across the UK asking them to state how they would interpret and categorise hypothetical, but nonetheless typical, clinical situations involving a cardiac arrest team being called. These included an event where the patient had regained consciousness prior to the arrival of the cardiac team and also an event where rigor mortis was already present and the resuscitation promptly abandoned upon the arrival of the cardiac arrest team. The percentage survival to discharge of adult cardiac arrests for each hospital was also requested. This identified whether inclusion or exclusion of certain clinical events may have influenced cardiac arrest survival figures for that hospital. It is clear from this study that in-hospital clinical events when a cardiac arrest team is called are audited with a great deal of inconsistency. Some events, such as a patient who has rigor mortis, are excluded as a false or inappropriate call in some hospitals and included as an unsuccessful resuscitation in others. There is a need for guidance on the inclusion and exclusion criteria for auditing of cardiac arrests so that meaningful data can be obtained from across the UK and useful conclusions drawn. The situation at present will result in data being audited that are of limited use. In the era of evidence-based medicine, it seems vital to obtain accurate cardiac arrest survival figures in order to have any hope of improving them.
Related Concept Videos
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

