Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Cardiovascular medications in primary care: treatment gaps and targeting by absolute risk
Natasha Rafter1, Jennie Connor, Jason Hall
1Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. n.rafter@ctru.auckland.ac.nz
Insights
Primary care patients with vascular disease often miss guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications. Risk-based prescribing for those without disease showed little targeting, indicating significant treatment gaps in cardiovascular event prevention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Primary Care Research
- Pharmacotherapy Evaluation
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally.
- Effective primary and secondary prevention strategies rely on appropriate medication use.
- Assessing medication prescribing patterns in primary care is crucial for identifying treatment gaps.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utilization of key cardiovascular medications in primary care.
- To determine the extent to which these medications target individuals at high absolute cardiovascular risk.
- To identify potential treatment gaps in cardiovascular disease prevention and management.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of demographic, risk factor, and prescribing data from a large primary care database.
- Inclusion of 25,384 individuals aged 45+ (men) and 55+ (women) consulting in 2000.
- Exclusion of patients with congestive heart failure; estimation of 5-year cardiovascular event risk using Framingham equation or history of vascular disease.
Main Results:
- Cardiovascular risk estimation was possible for only one-third of the population due to incomplete data.
- Only 28% of patients with documented vascular disease received a combination of lipid-lowering and blood pressure-lowering medications.
- For those without prior disease, combination therapy prescription ranged from 8% (lowest risk) to 16% (higher risk groups).
Conclusions:
- Over two-thirds of patients with vascular disease in this primary care cohort were undertreated with guideline-recommended medications.
- There was minimal evidence of risk-stratified prescribing for cardiovascular medications in individuals without existing vascular disease.
- Despite potential improvements (e.g., statin access), significant treatment gaps in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy likely persist.
Aim:
To measure the use of three major types of cardiovascular medications (antiplatelet, blood pressure lowering, and cholesterol lowering) in primary care, and their level of targeting to individuals at high absolute risk of a cardiovascular event.
Methods:
Demographic, risk factor, and prescribing data from the Dunedin Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners Research Unit database were analysed. The data set consisted of 25,384 individuals, men aged at least 45 years and women at least 55 years, who consulted a doctor in 2000 in a practice which supplied electronic clinical notes. People with congestive heart failure were excluded. Five-year risk of a cardiovascular event was estimated using a history of vascular disease or the Framingham risk equation, and correlated with prescribed medications.
Results:
Cardiovascular risk could be estimated for only one-third of the study population due to missing risk factor information. Data were largely unavailable on antiplatelet agents and so lipid lowering and blood pressure lowering medications were used to assess the 'treatment gap'. This combination was prescribed to only 28% of those with documented cardiovascular disease. For the remainder without a history of disease and for whom 5-year absolute risk of cardiovascular disease could be estimated, prescription of combination therapy ranged from 8% in the lowest risk group (<5% 5-year risk) to 14-16% in the other risk categories.
Conclusions:
Among this primary care population, more than two-thirds of people with vascular disease were not receiving guideline-recommended medications and there was little evidence of targeting by absolute risk for those without disease. However limited conclusions can be made for the latter group because of lack of documented risk factor information. While these treatment gaps may be less now, for example due to increased access to statins, it is probable that substantial gaps remain.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care