Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality improvement learning collaboratives.

Lea R Ayers1, Suzanne C Beyea, Marjorie M Godfrey

  • 1University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Nursing--Worcester, USA. Lea.Ayers@umassmed.edu

Quality Management in Health Care
|October 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptions of maternity care-seeking and care-giving experiences during a health-system shock: a qualitative study with healthcare professionals and policymakers in the UK, with a focus on care for marginalised groups.

BMJ public health·2026
Same author

Women's experiences of maternity care in high-income countries during the pandemic health system shock: a follow-up systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

The state of hospice: Impacts on equity, quality, and nursing-An AAN consensus paper.

Nursing outlook·2026
Same author

Experiences of seeking and receiving maternity care during a health-system shock: a qualitative study with women and partners in the UK with a focus on marginalised groups.

BMJ public health·2026
Same author

Seeking digital maternity healthcare during the pandemic health system shock: a systematic review of women's experiences in low- and middle-income countries.

Frontiers in reproductive health·2026
Same author

Using consideRATE to Evaluate Patient Experience in a Cancer Center: Psychometric and Healthcare Assessments.

Psycho-oncology·2025
Same journal

Association of a Post-Discharge Phone Call With Post-Acute Care Utilization During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Quality management in health care·2026
Same journal

Knowledge and Practices of Infection Control Among Healthcare Workers in Kazakhstan: Survey of Healthcare Workers From Accredited and Non-Accredited Hospitals.

Quality management in health care·2026
Same journal

Haddon Matrix: An Applied Analytical Framework for Patient Safety.

Quality management in health care·2026
Same journal

A Systematic Scoping Review of Capacity Building for Quality Improvement in Hospitals: Key Themes and Methodological Insights.

Quality management in health care·2026
Same journal

Simplifying Measurement and Reporting to Drive High Adherence and Sustainment of Best Practices.

Quality management in health care·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Lactation Medication Education for Health Professionals and Postpartum Women: A Study on Improving Breastfeeding Practices Following Cesarean Section.

Quality management in health care·2026
See all related articles

Successful data-driven Quality Improvement Learning Collaboratives (QILCs) thrive on trust, human connection, and integrated quality improvement philosophies. These elements are crucial for driving change through process and outcome measurement in healthcare settings.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Quality Improvement Science
  • Organizational Behavior

Background:

  • Quality Improvement Learning Collaboratives (QILCs) are vital for enhancing healthcare delivery.
  • Understanding the core characteristics of successful QILCs is essential for effective implementation.
  • Previous research has laid groundwork, but a synthesis of current practices is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and synthesize characteristics of successful data-driven Quality Improvement Learning Collaboratives (QILCs) in the US and Europe.
  • To extend existing guidelines for developing effective data-driven QILCs.
  • To provide actionable insights for healthcare settings and systems.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted interviews with 18 key informants across 10 organizations in 3 countries.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized an interview guide with open-ended questions.
  • Analyzed patterns in structure-process interactions within complex healthcare systems.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful QILCs share patterns including cultivated trust, focus on the human dimension, and nonlinear development.
    • Organizational culture and an integrated quality improvement philosophy are key.
    • A strong emphasis on process and outcome measurement drives change.

    Conclusions:

    • Core characteristics identified are critical for successful collaboration in healthcare.
    • The complexity of QILCs necessitates mixed-methods approaches (qualitative and quantitative) for effectiveness studies.
    • Findings contribute to developing robust guidelines for establishing and sustaining QILCs.