Related Experiment Videos
Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources
Trisha Greenhalgh1, Richard Peacock
1Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London Medical School, Holborn Union Building, London N19 5LW. p.greenhalgh@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Objective:
To describe where papers come from in a systematic review of complex evidence. Method Audit of how the 495 primary sources for the review were originally identified.
Results:
Only 30% of sources were obtained from the protocol defined at the outset of the study (that is, from the database and hand searches). Fifty one per cent were identified by "snowballing" (such as pursuing references of references), and 24% by personal knowledge or personal contacts.
Conclusion:
Systematic reviews of complex evidence cannot rely solely on protocol-driven search strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Methods of Medium Optimization
Antimicrobial Effectiveness