Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Between a rock and a soft place: developmental research and the child advocacy process
Thomas Grisso1, Laurence Steinberg
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester 01655, USA. thomas.grisso@umassmed.edu
Abstract:
Developmental researchers face a perilous path as they set out to perform research with child advocacy potential. We offer our observations regarding how researchers can navigate the path between science (the "rock") and advocacy (the "soft place"), based on our recent experience as directors of the MacArthur Juvenile Adjudicative Competence Study. Scientific research can be extraordinarily effective in the child advocacy process, but science and advocacy are very different endeavors. Scientific credibility demands impartiality, whereas advocacy is never impartial. For psychological scientists to be effective in conducting research relevant to child advocacy, it is important to maintain our identity as scientists and resist any efforts on the part of others to label this work as advocacy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Psychosexual Theory of Development
The Five Stages of Psychosexual Development
Freud's psychosexual...
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Childhood
The first four of Erikson's eight psychosocial stages...
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

