Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.

Johan A Wallin1

  • 1University Library of Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark. wallin@bib.sdu.dk

Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
|October 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?

Scientometrics·2015
Same author

Identification of environmentally relevant chemicals in bibliographic databases: a comparative analysis.

SpringerPlus·2013
Same author

The Matthew effect in environmental science publication: a bibliometric analysis of chemical substances in journal articles.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2011
See all related articles

Bibliometric studies are vital for research assessment, but require careful data normalization and domain expertise. Proper interpretation of bibliometric indicators demands technical skill and critical analysis to avoid common pitfalls.

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientometrics
  • Research Assessment

Background:

  • Bibliometric studies are increasingly utilized for evaluating scientific research.
  • The application of bibliometric indicators is prevalent in research assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the critical need for data normalization in bibliometric studies.
  • To emphasize the importance of domain-specific knowledge and critical interpretation in bibliometrics.

Main Methods:

  • Discusses the inherent dependence of bibliometric indicators on methodology.
  • Underscores the necessity of data normalization techniques.

Main Results:

  • Bibliometric indicators are highly sensitive to the methods employed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Effective data normalization is crucial for accurate bibliometric analysis.

    • Conclusions:

    • Bibliometric studies require technical proficiency, critical judgment, and deep understanding of the scientific field.
    • Accurate interpretation of bibliometric investigations is essential for reliable research assessment.