Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selection for acute liver failure: have we got it right?

Andres T Blei1

  • 1Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. a-blei@northwestern.edu

Liver Transplantation : Official Publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
|October 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Prognosis in Acute Liver Failure (ALF) depends on four factors: hepatic regeneration, hepatocellular failure, encephalopathy, and multiorgan failure (MOF). The Kings College criteria (KCC) are effective but may be complemented by newer markers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental models of hepatic encephalopathy: ISHEN guidelines.

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver·2009
Same author

Performance of the hepatic encephalopathy scoring algorithm in a clinical trial of patients with cirrhosis and severe hepatic encephalopathy.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2009
Same author

Melatonin arrhythmia is corrected after liver transplantation.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2009
Same author

The role of etiology in the hyperamylasemia of acute liver failure.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2009
Same author

Impact of preoperative overt hepatic encephalopathy on neurocognitive function after liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society·2009
Same author

Detection and diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infection in adults with acute liver failure.

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society·2008

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Prognostic Biomarkers

Background:

  • Acute Liver Failure (ALF) prognosis is multifactorial, involving hepatic regeneration, hepatocellular function, encephalopathy, and multiorgan failure (MOF).
  • Current prognostic criteria attempt to address these factors, but their performance varies, particularly between acetaminophen-induced and non-acetaminophen-induced ALF.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the key factors influencing outcomes in Acute Liver Failure (ALF).
  • To evaluate the performance of existing prognostic indices like the Kings College criteria (KCC).
  • To discuss the potential role of novel biomarkers in ALF prognostication.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established prognostic factors in ALF, including hepatic regeneration, hepatocellular failure (INR, Bilirubin), encephalopathy (Stage III/IV), and MOF (pH).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of the Kings College criteria (KCC) and Clichy criteria for predicting ALF outcomes.
  • Discussion of emerging prognostic markers such as serum phosphate, alpha fetoprotein, and blood lactate.
  • Main Results:

    • The Kings College criteria (KCC) demonstrate better performance than Clichy criteria but have limitations in specificity for acetaminophen-induced ALF and negative predictive value for non-acetaminophen-induced ALF.
    • Prognostic criteria differ based on the etiology of ALF, with a greater emphasis on hepatic regeneration in non-acetaminophen cases.
    • Newer markers like serum phosphate, alpha fetoprotein, and blood lactate show promise in complementing existing prognostic tools.

    Conclusions:

    • Prognosis in ALF is complex, influenced by a combination of hepatic and systemic factors.
    • While KCC is a valuable tool, its limitations necessitate consideration of etiology and potentially newer markers.
    • Clinical judgment remains crucial for managing ALF patients and interpreting prognostic data.